Berta Reyes
Chantilly, VA 20151 · infants to school-age · Home daycare: the provider shares the address with families
We are a directory, not the daycare. We cannot hold a spot, enroll a child or answer questions about care.
Own this daycare? Claim itAbout
Children of The World Learning Centers is a licensed child care center in Chantilly, Virginia. It is licensed by the state, for up to 114 children, serving infants, toddlers, preschoolers and school-age children.
It is open Monday to Friday, 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM. It describes a Bilingual / immersion and Faith-based approach, with after-school care, full-time care, part-time care and pre-k. It says it provides meals. It lists monthly tuition of $1,450.
Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety made 9 visits in the last 3 years and cited 3 rules across 2 of them. The visit list, in the state's words, is below.
Hours
| MondayToday | 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM |
| Wednesday | 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM |
| Thursday | 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM |
| Friday | 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM |
| Saturday | Not listed |
| Sunday | Not listed |
Programs
| Ages | Infants, toddlers, preschoolers and school-age childrenFrom the state license. It lists: 18 months old through fifth grade |
|---|---|
| Programs | After-school care, full-time care, part-time care, pre-k, preschool, summer camp and toddler care |
| Approach | Bilingual / immersion (English/Arabic or English/French), Faith-based (Islamic) |
| Daily life | Meals provided; Parents pack food; Snacks provided. Extended care: Coverage from 7am to 7pm each day, if needed |
| Child care subsidy | Accepts state child care subsidiesFrom the state license |
| Discounts | 5% discount for paying one annual payment |
| Parent updates | Parent app (Procare) |
| Languages | Arabic and French |
| Licensed capacity | 114 childrenFrom the state license |
Cost
Children of The World Learning Centers lists monthly tuition of $1,450.
| Monthly · program, in its own words | Price |
|---|---|
| Option 1: $14,500.00 per year, paid monthly | $1,450 |
| Yearly · program, in its own words | Price |
|---|---|
| Option 1: Ten Months Contract – $14,500.00 per year | $14,500 |
| one time application fee | $50 |
| annual enrollment fee, $150 per child | $150 |
State record
9 visits in the last 3 years · Last visit May 1, 2026: no rules cited
Rules cited on 4 of 9 visits · 3 rules in all
For comparison: 91% of Virginia daycares had at least one rule cited in the last 3 years; the typical daycare had 8.
A cited rule is what an inspector found on the day of a visit. It is not a rating of the daycare today.
Own this daycare? Add your response to the state record
8VAC20-780-350-B-1
“The required staff to child ratio for birth up to 16 months is 1:4 (staff:children). There were 10 children with 2 staff in a group where Child A in the group was under 16 months of age, requiring the ratio to be 1:4. The classroom was over the ratio from approximately 12:15pm-1:25pm, when a third staff member was added to the classroom.”
8VAC20-780-350-B-1
“The required staff to child ratio for birth up to 16 months is 1:4 (staff:children). There were 10 children with 2 staff in a group where Child A in the group was under 16 months of age, requiring the ratio to be 1:4. The classroom was over the ratio from approximately 12:15pm-1:25pm, when a third staff member was added to the classroom.”
8VAC20-780-560-G
“Based on observation, when food is brought from home it is not always labeled with the date. Evidence: 1. Two lunch boxes (infant room) containing food from home were observed to have no date on them at the time of the inspection.”
8VAC20-780-440-B
“Based on observation, cribs were not identified for use by a specific child. Evidence: 1. All cribs located in the infant room were not identified for use by a specific child at the time of the inspection.”
8VAC20-780-560-G
“Based on observation, when food is brought from home it is not always labeled with the date. Evidence: 1. Two lunch boxes (infant room) containing food from home were observed to have no date on them at the time of the inspection.”
8VAC20-780-440-B
“Based on observation, cribs were not identified for use by a specific child. Evidence: 1. All cribs located in the infant room were not identified for use by a specific child at the time of the inspection.”
8VAC20-780-70
“Based on a review of staff records, 1 out of 3 staff did not have the required records kept for each staff person. Evidence: 1. Staff #3 (doh: 11/8/2022) had 2 references on file that were dated 11/22/2022, after the employee was hired.”
8VAC20-780-160-A
“Based on a review of staff records, 2 out of 3 staff members did not submit documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening within the time frame allotted. Evidence: 1. Staff #2 (doh: 2/6/2023) had a tuberculosis screening on file dated 11/23/2022. 2. Staff #3 (doh: 11/8/2022) had a tuberculosis screening on file dated 11/11/2022.”
8VAC20-780-240-B
“Based on a review of staff records, 2 out of 3 staff did not complete orientation training prior to the staff member working alone with children and no later than seven days of the date of assuming job responsibilities. Evidence: 1. Staff #2 (doh: 2/6/2023) had documentation on file that the staff member's orientation was completed by 2/27/2023. 2. Staff #3 (doh: 11/8/2022) had documentation on file that the staff member's orientation was completed by 4/10/2023.”
22.1-289-036-B-4
“Based on a review of staff records, 1 out of 3 staff did not have a copy of the results of a criminal history record information check, a sex offender registry check, and a search of the child abuse and neglect registry or equivalent registry from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years. Evidence: 1. Staff #3 (doh: 11/8/2022) did not have the required out of state sex offender registry check for State #1 in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years. 2. Staff #3 (doh: 11/8/2022) did not have the required out of state search of the child abuse and neglect registry check for State #1 in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years. 3. Staff #3 (doh: 11/8/2022) did not have the required out of state criminal history record check for State #1 in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years.”
8VAC20-780-70
“Based on a review of staff records, 1 out of 3 staff did not have the required records kept for each staff person. Evidence: 1. Staff #3 (doh: 11/8/2022) had 2 references on file that were dated 11/22/2022, after the employee was hired.”
8VAC20-780-160-A
“Based on a review of staff records, 2 out of 3 staff members did not submit documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening within the time frame allotted. Evidence: 1. Staff #2 (doh: 2/6/2023) had a tuberculosis screening on file dated 11/23/2022. 2. Staff #3 (doh: 11/8/2022) had a tuberculosis screening on file dated 11/11/2022.”
8VAC20-780-240-B
“Based on a review of staff records, 2 out of 3 staff did not complete orientation training prior to the staff member working alone with children and no later than seven days of the date of assuming job responsibilities. Evidence: 1. Staff #2 (doh: 2/6/2023) had documentation on file that the staff member's orientation was completed by 2/27/2023. 2. Staff #3 (doh: 11/8/2022) had documentation on file that the staff member's orientation was completed by 4/10/2023.”
22.1-289-036-B-4
“Based on a review of staff records, 1 out of 3 staff did not have a copy of the results of a criminal history record information check, a sex offender registry check, and a search of the child abuse and neglect registry or equivalent registry from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years. Evidence: 1. Staff #3 (doh: 11/8/2022) did not have the required out of state sex offender registry check for State #1 in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years. 2. Staff #3 (doh: 11/8/2022) did not have the required out of state search of the child abuse and neglect registry check for State #1 in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years. 3. Staff #3 (doh: 11/8/2022) did not have the required out of state criminal history record check for State #1 in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years.”
8VAC20-780-540-E
“Based on a review of nonmedical emergency supplies, all required nonmedical emergency supplies were not available. Evidence: 1. There was no battery operated radio available on-site during the time of the inspection.”
8VAC20-780-270-A
“Based on observation, areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside, were not maintained in a clean, safe and operable condition. Evidence: 1. The gate from the front office/entrance area to the hallway had protruding nails and the wood was broken. It was very loose when closed due to these conditions.”
8VAC20-780-60-A
“Based on a review of children's records and staff interview, the center did not maintain and keep at the center a separate record for each child enrolled with the required information. Evidence: 1. Child A (23 mos.), Child B (14 mos.), Child C (2 yrs), Child D (2 yrs), and Child E (11 mos.) were observed receiving care at the facility at the time of the inspection and did not have a child record on file. 2. Staff B stated that there were no child records on file at the facility for Child A, B, C, D, and E.”
8VAC20-780-180-B
“Based on observation and staff interview, all staff who work directly with children were not capable of communicating with emergency personnel. Evidence: 1. Staff C was unable to demonstrate the ability to communicate with emergency personnel, if necessary. 2. Staff B stated that Staff C was going to take English classes.”
8VAC20-780-40-E
“Based on observation and staff interview, the licensee did not maintain compliance with the standards and terms of the current license issued by the department. Evidence: 1. As the LI was conducting a tour of the facility, the LI noticed a room that appeared to have cribs. The room was not set up properly for infant care, but had bouncy chairs, cribs, and boxes inside of it. When looking out of the window of the classroom, the LI noticed 2 staff members, with 5 children that appeared to be under the age of 2.5 years sitting outside of the door of the classroom. The LI observed that one infant did not have any socks on in the (approximately) 45 degree weather and one toddler was walking with only one shoe on. The LI tried to open the door to exit the classroom but it was locked. The LI exited from the front door of the facility and walked around to the side of the building and approached the 2 staff members. The staff members began to walk away and repeatedly said "No English" as they tried to gather the 5 children. The LI explained that it was very cold and that the children and staff needed to come back inside since all of the children did not have proper attire. 2. Once back inside the facility, it was determined that the facility was operating outside of their current license terms. There were 5 children in care under the age of 2.5 years. The facility's current license only allows them to care for children from 2.5 years-12 years of age. 3. When it was discovered by the LI that the facility was operating outside of their current license terms, staff A stated "I admit, I made a mistake. I accepted the younger children and I shouldn't have done that."”
8VAC20-780-340-F
“Based on observation, children under 10 years of age were not always within actual sight and sound supervision of staff. Evidence: 1. At approximately 2:03pm, Child A (5 years old) was sent from the Flowers classroom to the bathroom on the other side of the facility, which is approximately 9 feet from the Flowers classroom. Child A was then observed leaving the restroom and returning back to the Flowers classroom. There was no staff member supervising Child A for approximately 2 minutes, from 2:03pm-2:05pm.”
8VAC20-780-500-B
“Based on observation, a nonabsorbent surface for diapering or changing was not used. Evidence: 1. There were small tears observed on the diaper changing pad surface.”
8VAC20-780-540-E
“Based on a review of nonmedical emergency supplies, all required nonmedical emergency supplies were not available. Evidence: 1. There was no battery operated radio available on-site during the time of the inspection.”
8VAC20-780-270-A
“Based on observation, areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside, were not maintained in a clean, safe and operable condition. Evidence: 1. The gate from the front office/entrance area to the hallway had protruding nails and the wood was broken. It was very loose when closed due to these conditions.”
8VAC20-780-60-A
“Based on a review of children's records and staff interview, the center did not maintain and keep at the center a separate record for each child enrolled with the required information. Evidence: 1. Child A (23 mos.), Child B (14 mos.), Child C (2 yrs), Child D (2 yrs), and Child E (11 mos.) were observed receiving care at the facility at the time of the inspection and did not have a child record on file. 2. Staff B stated that there were no child records on file at the facility for Child A, B, C, D, and E.”
8VAC20-780-180-B
“Based on observation and staff interview, all staff who work directly with children were not capable of communicating with emergency personnel. Evidence: 1. Staff C was unable to demonstrate the ability to communicate with emergency personnel, if necessary. 2. Staff B stated that Staff C was going to take English classes.”
8VAC20-780-40-E
“Based on observation and staff interview, the licensee did not maintain compliance with the standards and terms of the current license issued by the department. Evidence: 1. As the LI was conducting a tour of the facility, the LI noticed a room that appeared to have cribs. The room was not set up properly for infant care, but had bouncy chairs, cribs, and boxes inside of it. When looking out of the window of the classroom, the LI noticed 2 staff members, with 5 children that appeared to be under the age of 2.5 years sitting outside of the door of the classroom. The LI observed that one infant did not have any socks on in the (approximately) 45 degree weather and one toddler was walking with only one shoe on. The LI tried to open the door to exit the classroom but it was locked. The LI exited from the front door of the facility and walked around to the side of the building and approached the 2 staff members. The staff members began to walk away and repeatedly said "No English" as they tried to gather the 5 children. The LI explained that it was very cold and that the children and staff needed to come back inside since all of the children did not have proper attire. 2. Once back inside the facility, it was determined that the facility was operating outside of their current license terms. There were 5 children in care under the age of 2.5 years. The facility's current license only allows them to care for children from 2.5 years-12 years of age. 3. When it was discovered by the LI that the facility was operating outside of their current license terms, staff A stated "I admit, I made a mistake. I accepted the younger children and I shouldn't have done that."”
8VAC20-780-340-F
“Based on observation, children under 10 years of age were not always within actual sight and sound supervision of staff. Evidence: 1. At approximately 2:03pm, Child A (5 years old) was sent from the Flowers classroom to the bathroom on the other side of the facility, which is approximately 9 feet from the Flowers classroom. Child A was then observed leaving the restroom and returning back to the Flowers classroom. There was no staff member supervising Child A for approximately 2 minutes, from 2:03pm-2:05pm.”
8VAC20-780-500-B
“Based on observation, a nonabsorbent surface for diapering or changing was not used. Evidence: 1. There were small tears observed on the diaper changing pad surface.”
Reviews
If your child goes or went here, your review helps other parents. We check every review against our review guidelines.
Chantilly, VA 20151 · infants to school-age · Home daycare: the provider shares the address with families
Chantilly, VA 20151 · infants to school-age · Home daycare: the provider shares the address with families
Chantilly, VA 20151 · infants to preschool · Home daycare: the provider shares the address with families
Chantilly, VA 20151 · infants to school-age · Home daycare: the provider shares the address with families
5001 Westone Plaza, Chantilly, VA
13615 Pennsboro Drive, Chantilly, VA
3411 Lees Corner Road, Chantilly, VA
4350 Blue Spring Drive, Chantilly, VA
Chantilly, VA 20151 · infants to school-age · Home daycare: the provider shares the address with families
FAQ
Yes. Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety lists it as licensed and operating.
Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety lists the most recent visit on May 1, 2026, with no rules cited. It lists 9 visits in the last 3 years.
Yes. Inspectors cited 3 rules across 4 of 9 visits in the last 3 years. For comparison: 91% of Virginia daycares had at least one rule cited in the last 3 years; the typical daycare had 8. A cited rule is what an inspector found on the day of a visit. It is not a rating of the daycare today.
114, the licensed capacity on the state record. It is licensed to serve infants, toddlers, preschoolers and school-age children.
Yes. The state record says it accepts child care subsidies.
Monday to Friday, 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM. These are the hours on the state record. Holiday hours can differ.
Monthly tuition of $1,450, as it lists it.
(703) 956-6266.
4451 Brookfield Corporation Dr., Chantilly, VA 20151.