Montessori Kids Universe of Lorton Valley
8931 Ox Road, Lorton, VA
We are a directory, not the daycare. We cannot hold a spot, enroll a child or answer questions about care.
Own this daycare? Claim itAbout
SACC at Halley is a licensed child care center in Fairfax Station, Virginia. It is licensed by the state, for up to 100 children, serving school-age children.
Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety made 11 visits in the last 3 years and cited 3 rules across 2 of them. The visit list, in the state's words, is below.
Hours
Programs
| Ages | School-age childrenFrom the state license |
|---|---|
| Child care subsidy | Accepts state child care subsidiesFrom the state license |
| Licensed capacity | 100 childrenFrom the state license |
Cost
SACC at Halley has not listed its tuition.
State record
11 visits in the last 3 years · Last visit Mar 2, 2026: 2 rules cited
Rules cited on 2 of 11 visits · 3 rules in all
For comparison: 91% of Virginia daycares had at least one rule cited in the last 3 years; the typical daycare had 8.
A cited rule is what an inspector found on the day of a visit. It is not a rating of the daycare today.
Own this daycare? Add your response to the state record
8VAC20-790-600-D-1
“Staff shall have current certification in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) appropriate to the ages of children in care. Staff # 1's CPR certification expired 3 months ago.”
8VAC20-790-600-D-2
“Staff shall have current certification in first aid appropriate to the ages of children in care. Staff #1's first aid certification expired 3 months ago.”
8VAC20-780-550-O
“Based on staff interview and record review, the center did not notify parents of known injury by the end of the day of the incident. Evidence: 1. Child # 1 sustained an injury on 7/18/24 at 9:30 am. 2. Child # 1's parent was not notified of the injury until 7/19/24 at 8:30 am. 3. The serious injury report submitted by the center listed the same dates and times for the injury and notification of the injury. 4. Staff # 1 stated that the center had a system in place to let the parent know to see staff at the end of the day. The parent did not see that notice and staff did not notify the parent on 7/18/24 of the injury.”
8VAC20-780-80-B-2
“Based on record review, the center did not inform the department's representative as soon as practicable, but not to exceed two business days, of any injury to a child that occurs while the child is under the supervision of the center and requires outside medical attention. Evidence: 1. On 9/1/22 a child in care sustained injuries on the playground. Child # 1's was seen by a physician. 2. The department received notification of this incident requiring outside medical attention on 9/9/22.”
8VAC20-780-80-B-2
“Based on record review, the center did not inform the department's representative as soon as practicable, but not to exceed two business days, of any injury to a child that occurs while the child is under the supervision of the center and requires outside medical attention. Evidence: 1. On 9/1/22 a child in care sustained injuries on the playground. Child # 1's was seen by a physician. 2. The department received notification of this incident requiring outside medical attention on 9/9/22.”
8VAC20-780-60-A-8
“Based on records review, the center did not obtain a written allergy action plan with a diagnosed food allergy, to include instructions from a physician regarding the food to which the child is allergic and the steps to be taken in the event of a suspected or confirmed allergic reaction for each child. Evidence: 1. Child # 1's record indicated that he had a diagnosed allergy to eggs. 2. The center did not obtain a written allergy action plan for Child # 1.”
8VAC20-780-60-A-8
“Based on records review, the center did not obtain a written allergy action plan with a diagnosed food allergy, to include instructions from a physician regarding the food to which the child is allergic and the steps to be taken in the event of a suspected or confirmed allergic reaction for each child. Evidence: 1. Child # 1's record indicated that he had a diagnosed allergy to eggs. 2. The center did not obtain a written allergy action plan for Child # 1.”
22VAC40-185-240-D-1
“Based on staff interview and records review, medication was administered to a child without the center staff having satisfactorily completed a training program for this purpose approved by the Board of Nursing. Evidence: 1. Child # 1has a prescribed emergency medication (insulin) on site to be administered on an as needed basis. 2. The medication log showed: a. 2 units of the insulin were administered on 9/17/21 at 5:15 pm; b. 2 units of the insulin were administered on 9/21/21 at 5:07 pm; and c. Staff # 1 signed off on the medication log as having administered the medication on both these dates. 3. Staff # 2 stated that Staff # 1 did not administer the medication, but supervised Child # 1 while the child self administered the medication. 4. On 9/17/21 and 9/21/21 and at the times of administration, there were no staff members on site with the required emergency medication administration training related to Child # 1's medical need. 5. There was no documentation from the physician or parent in Child # 1's record that permitted the child to self administer the medication.”
22VAC40-185-240-D-1
“Based on staff interview and records review, medication was administered to a child without the center staff having satisfactorily completed a training program for this purpose approved by the Board of Nursing. Evidence: 1. Child # 1has a prescribed emergency medication (insulin) on site to be administered on an as needed basis. 2. The medication log showed: a. 2 units of the insulin were administered on 9/17/21 at 5:15 pm; b. 2 units of the insulin were administered on 9/21/21 at 5:07 pm; and c. Staff # 1 signed off on the medication log as having administered the medication on both these dates. 3. Staff # 2 stated that Staff # 1 did not administer the medication, but supervised Child # 1 while the child self administered the medication. 4. On 9/17/21 and 9/21/21 and at the times of administration, there were no staff members on site with the required emergency medication administration training related to Child # 1's medical need. 5. There was no documentation from the physician or parent in Child # 1's record that permitted the child to self administer the medication.”
Reviews
If your child goes or went here, your review helps other parents. We check every review against our review guidelines.
8931 Ox Road, Lorton, VA
8905 Ox Road, Lorton, VA
Springfield, VA 22153 · infants to school-age · Home daycare: the provider shares the address with families
9350 Crosspointe Drive, Fairfax Station, VA
8350 White Feather Court, Lorton, VA
8390 Laurel Crest Drive, Lorton, VA
9060 Power House Road, Lorton, VA
8001 Newington Forest Ave, Springfield, VA
8808 Redman Street, Springfield, VA
FAQ
Yes. Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety lists it as licensed and operating.
Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety lists the most recent visit on March 2, 2026, with 2 rules cited. It lists 11 visits in the last 3 years.
Yes. Inspectors cited 3 rules across 2 of 11 visits in the last 3 years. For comparison: 91% of Virginia daycares had at least one rule cited in the last 3 years; the typical daycare had 8. A cited rule is what an inspector found on the day of a visit. It is not a rating of the daycare today.
100, the licensed capacity on the state record. It is licensed to serve school-age children.
Yes. The state record says it accepts child care subsidies.
Its hours are not listed. Call (703) 551-5760 to confirm.
It has not listed its tuition. Call (703) 551-5760 to ask.
(703) 551-5760.
8850 Cross Chase Circle, Fairfax Station, VA 22039. The nearest other daycare we list is New Hope Church, 0.2 miles away.