Skip to content
Child care center 

Montessori Academy of Virginia-Suffolk

5805 Harbourview Boulevard, Suffolk, VA 23435
licensed capacity
170
open each week
5 days

We are a directory, not the daycare. We cannot hold a spot, enroll a child or answer questions about care.

Own this daycare? Claim it
Licensed by the stateInspection record

About

About Montessori Academy of Virginia-Suffolk

Montessori Academy of Virginia-Suffolk is a licensed child care center in Suffolk, Virginia. It is licensed by the state, for up to 170 children, serving toddlers, preschoolers and school-age children.

It is open Monday to Friday, 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM. It describes a Montessori approach.

Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety made 10 visits in the last 3 years and cited 9 rules across 3 of them. The visit list, in the state's words, is below.

MontessoriSchool-age

Ages served: toddlers, preschoolers and school-age children

From the state license
Ask when you call: rates, current openings, staff-to-child ratio and teacher qualifications.
Type
Child care center
Ages
Toddlers, preschoolers and school-age children
Hours today
7:00 AM to 5:00 PM
Licensed capacity
170 children

Hours

Hours

MondayToday7:00 AM to 5:00 PM
Tuesday7:00 AM to 5:00 PM
Wednesday7:00 AM to 5:00 PM
Thursday7:00 AM to 5:00 PM
Friday7:00 AM to 5:00 PM
SaturdayNot listed
SundayNot listed
From the state license

Programs

Programs and care

AgesToddlers, preschoolers and school-age childrenFrom the state license
ApproachMontessori
Licensed capacity170 childrenFrom the state license
A daycare without an item may still offer it; ask.

Cost

Tuition and costs

Montessori Academy of Virginia-Suffolk has not listed its tuition.

Ask the daycare for its ratesIt has not listed its tuition.

State record

Inspection reports for Montessori Academy of Virginia-Suffolk

License

Status
Licensed and operating
License type
License (Two Year)
Capacity
170 children
Ages
Toddlers, preschoolers and school-age children
License number
#1107316
See the state's record

Summary

10 visits in the last 3 years · Last visit Mar 3, 2026: 1 rule cited

Rules cited on 4 of 10 visits · 9 rules in all

  • Background checks 3
  • Records and paperwork 3
  • Staff training and qualifications 2
  • Health, medication and illness 1

For comparison: 91% of Virginia daycares had at least one rule cited in the last 3 years; the typical daycare had 8.

A cited rule is what an inspector found on the day of a visit. It is not a rating of the daycare today.

Own this daycare? Add your response to the state record

See all 14 visits
  1. Mar 3, 2026Inspection1 rule cited
    • Background checks

      22.1-289.036-A

      “The center is required to have an applicant or agent undergo a background checks every five years. The most recent criminal history search for applicant/agent #1 was overdue by approximately one year.”
  2. Dec 19, 2025InspectionNo rules cited
  3. Mar 27, 2025InspectionNo rules cited
  4. Jul 31, 2024InspectionNo rules cited
  5. Jul 31, 2024VisitNo rules cited
  6. May 3, 2024InspectionNo rules cited
  7. May 3, 2024VisitNo rules cited
  8. Feb 23, 2024Inspection5 rules cited
    • Background checks

      22.1-289.035-B-4

      “***REPEAT VIOLATION*** Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not always obtain a copy of the results of a criminal history record information check, a sex offender registry check, and a search of the child abuse and neglect registry or equivalent registry from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years. Eight staff records were reviewed: The record for staff #2 whose date of employment is 2/8/2023 documented her residence in Massachusetts (MA) within the past 5 years. The record for staff #2 did not contain the results of a Sex Offender Search or the results of a Criminal History Search for the state of MA. The record for staff #3 whose date of employment was 1/11/2024 documented her residence in Florida (FL) within the past 5 years. The record did not contain the results of a Search of the Abuse and Neglect Registry or the results of a Sex Offender Registry Search for the state of FL. The record for staff #4 whose date of employment was 1/3/2024 documented her residence in Florida (FL) and North Carolina (NC). The record did not contain the results of a Search of the Abuse and Neglect Registry or the results of a Sex Offender Registry Search for the state of FL and for the state of NC. The record for staff #6 whose date of employment was 12/4/2024 documented her residence in District of Columbia (DC), Delaware (DE), Maryland (MD), New Jersey (NJ) and Washington (WA). The record did not contain: the results of a Criminal History Search for DC; the results of a Criminal History Search for DE; the results of an Abuse and Neglect Registry Search for DE; the results of an Abuse and Neglect Registry Search for MD; the results of an Abuse and Neglect Registry Search for WA. The record for staff #7 whose date of employment was 9/26/2023 documented her residence in Florida (FL) within the past 5 years. The record did not contain the results of a Search of the Abuse and Neglect Registry or the results of a Sex Offender Registry Search for the state of FL. The Program Director in charge at the time of the inspection confirmed that this documentation was not present in the staff records at the time of the inspection.”
    • Health, medication and illness

      8VAC20-780-60-A-8

      “Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did obtain a written care plan for each child with a diagnosed food allergy, to include instructions from a physician regarding the food to which the child is allergic and the steps to be taken in the event of a suspected or confirmed allergic reaction. Evidence: Ten children's records were reviewed. The record for child #2 contained documentation that child #2 has a diagnosed allergy to avocado. Child #2's record did not contain a care plan from child #2's physician regarding the food to which the child is allergic and the steps to be taken in the event of a suspected or confirmed allergic reaction. The program director present during the inspection confirmed that this documentation was not in child #2's record at the time of inspection.”
    • Staff training and qualifications

      8VAC20-780-240-B

      “***REPEAT VIOLATION***' Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee was unable to demonstrate that staff always complete orientation appropriate to the age of the children in care and including the required facility specific topics prior to the staff member working alone with children and no later than seven days of the date of assuming job responsibilities. Evidence: Eight staff records were reviewed. The records for staff #1(employed 1/2/2024), staff #3 (employed 1/11/2024), staff #4 (employed 1/3/2024) and staff # 6 (employed 12/4/2024) did not contain documentation to demonstrate that facility specific orientation training was completed. The program director present during the inspection confirmed that this documentation was not present in the staff records at the time of the inspection.”
    • Records and paperwork

      8VAC20-780-70

      “***REPEAT VIOLATION*** Based on a review of records the licensee did not always ensure that each staff record contained the required documentation to include documentation of two or more references as to character and reputation as well as competency having been checked ore employment or volunteering. Evidence: Eight staff records were reviewed. The records for staff #1(employed 1/2/2024, staff #4 (employed 1/3/2024) and staff #7 (employed 9/26/2023) did not contain documentation to demonstrate that any reference checks as to the character, reputation and competency of the candidate had been checked prior to their employment or thereafter.”
    • Records and paperwork

      22.1-289.011-F

      “Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not always post the documents required by the Superintendent shall be posted in a conspicuous place on the licensed premises. Evidence: The Results (violation notice) for the last licensing inspection were not posted in the facility at the time of the inspection. The program director present at the time of the inspection confirmed that the results were not posted in a the facility.”
  9. Nov 28, 2023Inspection3 rules cited
    • Records and paperwork

      8VAC20-780-70

      “Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not ensure that a record containing all required documentation is maintained for each staff member. Evidence: Nine staff records were reviewed. The record for staff #4 did not contain documentation that two references were checked for staff #4 prior to employment. The administrator on site during the inspection was not able to locate this documentation during the inspection.”
    • Staff training and qualifications

      8VAC20-780-240-B

      “Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not always maintain documentation that demonstrated that orientation training was completed prior to working alone with children and no later than 7 days after the date of assuming job responsibilities. Evidence: Nine staff records were reviewed. The record for staff #4, whose date of employment was documented as 11/6/23, did not contain documentation that orientation training had been completed. The administrator on site during the inspection was not able to locate this documentation during the inspection.”
    • Background checks

      22.1-289.035-B-4

      “***REPEAT*** Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not always obtain, for every applicable employee, a copy of the results of a criminal history record information check, a sex offender registry check, and a search of the child abuse and neglect registry or equivalent registry from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years. Evidence: Ten staff records were reviewed. The record for staff #1, whose date of hire was documented as 9/27/2023, contained a Sworn Disclosure Statement which indicated that employee #1 resided in the state of New York within the past 5 years. The record did not contain the results of a Abuse and Neglect Registry Search for the state of New York within 45 days of employment in the Child Day Center. The administrator present during the inspection confirmed that this documentation was not in the record for staff #1. The record for staff #7, whose date of hire was documented as 9/25/2023, contained a Sworn Disclosure Statement which indicated that employee #7 resided in the state of Texas within the past 5 years. The record did not contain the results of a Criminal Record Search for the state of Texas prior to employment in the Child Day Center. The administrator present during the inspection confirmed that this documentation was not in the record for staff #7.”
  10. Nov 28, 2023Visit3 rules cited
    • Records and paperwork

      8VAC20-780-70

      “Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not ensure that a record containing all required documentation is maintained for each staff member. Evidence: Nine staff records were reviewed. The record for staff #4 did not contain documentation that two references were checked for staff #4 prior to employment. The administrator on site during the inspection was not able to locate this documentation during the inspection.”
    • Staff training and qualifications

      8VAC20-780-240-B

      “Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not always maintain documentation that demonstrated that orientation training was completed prior to working alone with children and no later than 7 days after the date of assuming job responsibilities. Evidence: Nine staff records were reviewed. The record for staff #4, whose date of employment was documented as 11/6/23, did not contain documentation that orientation training had been completed. The administrator on site during the inspection was not able to locate this documentation during the inspection.”
    • Background checks

      22.1-289.035-B-4

      “***REPEAT*** Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not always obtain, for every applicable employee, a copy of the results of a criminal history record information check, a sex offender registry check, and a search of the child abuse and neglect registry or equivalent registry from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years. Evidence: Ten staff records were reviewed. The record for staff #1, whose date of hire was documented as 9/27/2023, contained a Sworn Disclosure Statement which indicated that employee #1 resided in the state of New York within the past 5 years. The record did not contain the results of a Abuse and Neglect Registry Search for the state of New York within 45 days of employment in the Child Day Center. The administrator present during the inspection confirmed that this documentation was not in the record for staff #1. The record for staff #7, whose date of hire was documented as 9/25/2023, contained a Sworn Disclosure Statement which indicated that employee #7 resided in the state of Texas within the past 5 years. The record did not contain the results of a Criminal Record Search for the state of Texas prior to employment in the Child Day Center. The administrator present during the inspection confirmed that this documentation was not in the record for staff #7.”
Show 4 earlier visits
  1. Jun 13, 2023Inspection2 rules cited
    • Building, equipment and play areas

      8VAC20-780-270-A

      “Based on observation and interview, the center did not ensure all areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside are maintained in a clean, safe, and operable condition. Evidence: In Children's House 3-6 bathroom, the toilet would not flush. Interview with staff confirmed the toilet not working properly.”
    • Background checks

      22.1-289.035-B-4

      “Based on staff records and interview, the center did not ensure to obtain a copy of the results of a criminal history record check and a search of the child abuse and neglect registry from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years. Evidence: In Staff#3's record (date of hire: 09/01/22) there was no results of a central registry finding for the state of GA. In Staff#4's record (date of hire: 08/23/21) there was no results of a criminal and central registry findings for the state of TX. Interview with staff confirmed the out of state results were not available for review during the inspection.”
  2. Apr 21, 2023Inspection1 rule cited
    • Background checks

      8VAC20-770-60-C-2

      “Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not ensure that results of a search of the central registry are obtained for each employee within 30 days of employment. Evidence: Seven staff records were reviewed. The record for staff #6 documented the start of employment as 9/1/2022. The central registry findings were dated 12/12/2022. Documentation shows that a second request was sent on 11/16/2022, which is 76 days after the employee began employment.”
  3. Jul 8, 2022Complaint investigation2 rules cited
    • Records and paperwork

      8VAC20-780-420-A Complaint related: Yes

      “Based on a review of written procedures and interviews, the program does not provide all of the required written procedures to parents before the child's first day of attending. Evidence: 1. The written policies included in the current parent handbook do state that the custodial parent has a right to be admitted to the center, as required by the Code of Virginia 22.1-289.054. 2. The parent handbook states throughout , in several areas "Let your child walk independently into school carrying own belongings." ; "Students will be walked into the school building by staff members during drop off time." ; "Pull up to the drop off entrance of the building and please remain in your vehicle." ; and for late arriving students "ring the front doorbell; student will be escorted to class by office personnel". 3. The parent handbook states that Class room observations, using viewing windows, by reservation, are encouraged. However, it is noted that no observations will be scheduled during the month of September or "until children are settled into a routine and anxieties are dispelled". In addition, it states that "due to Covid-19 restrictions we will not have casual observations until further notice." 4. Interviews with the Program Director revealed that parents are not normally permitted in the classrooms without prior arrangement and are discouraged from entering the facility unless an appointment is made in advance to observe from the viewing window or to meet with staff.”
    • Other rules

      8VAC20-780-420-C Complaint related: Yes

      “Interviews with the parent of a two year old child and with the Program Director revealed that a parent requested to walk her two-year-old child to her classroom on the first day of summer camp (6/27/2022) but was not permitted to enter the facility to do so.”
  4. Mar 1, 2022Inspection4 rules cited
    • Background checks

      8VAC20-770-40-D-1-a

      “Based on a review of documentation and interview, the program was not able to demonstrate that results of a search of the central registry had been obtained for the applicant. Evidence: The application received by the department for Renewal of the program's license listed applicant #1 as a designated applicant / licensee / registrant. However, at the inspection conducted on 3/1/2022, the program director confirmed that she was unable to locate documentation of the results of a Search of the Central Registry for Applicant #1 and was also unable to obtain this documentation from the licensee.”
    • Safety and hazards

      8VAC20-780-260-A

      “Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee was not able to demonstrate that a fire inspection had been conducted within the past 12 months. Evidence: The most recent fire inspection available for review at the time of the inspection on 3/1/2022 was dated 8/25/2020. The program director confirmed that she did not have documentation of a more recent inspection having been conducted.”
    • Safety and hazards

      22.1-289.058

      “Based on observation and interview, the center is not equipped with at least one Carbon Monoxide detector. Evidence: A carbon monoxide detecter was not observed in the center during the inspection on 3/1/2022. The Program Director stated that the center was built before 2015 and she confirmed that a carbon monoxide detector was not installed in the building.”
    • Background checks

      22.1-289.035-B-4

      “Based on a review pf documentation and interview, the licensee was unable to demonstrate that an Out of State Sex Offender Registry and an Out of State Criminal History Name Check were obtained for each state, other than Virginia, that any individual employee has resided in the past 5 years, prior to their 1st day of employment/service at the center. Evidence:Four staff records were reviewed at the time of inspection on 3/1/2022. The record for staff #1 contained a Sworn Disclosure statement that indicated that staff #1 resided in Texas within 5 years of employment at the program. There were no results in the record for a Sex offender Registry search for the state of Texas. There were no results in the record for a Criminal Record Check for the state of Texas. The program director confirmed that these background checks had not been completed. Staff #1 was working in the center at the time of the inspection.”

Copied from Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety on October 2, 2026; the state's records start around Oct 2012. Rule wording, severity and dates are the state's.

Reviews

Parent reviews

No parent reviews yet

If your child goes or went here, your review helps other parents. We check every review against our review guidelines.

Your rating

Daycares near Montessori Academy of Virginia-Suffolk

FAQ

Questions about Montessori Academy of Virginia-Suffolk

Is Montessori Academy of Virginia-Suffolk licensed?

Yes. Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety lists it as licensed and operating.

When was Montessori Academy of Virginia-Suffolk last inspected?

Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety lists the most recent visit on March 3, 2026, with 1 rule cited. It lists 10 visits in the last 3 years.

Has Montessori Academy of Virginia-Suffolk had rules cited by the state?

Yes. Inspectors cited 9 rules across 4 of 10 visits in the last 3 years. For comparison: 91% of Virginia daycares had at least one rule cited in the last 3 years; the typical daycare had 8. A cited rule is what an inspector found on the day of a visit. It is not a rating of the daycare today.

How many children can Montessori Academy of Virginia-Suffolk care for?

170, the licensed capacity on the state record. It is licensed to serve toddlers, preschoolers and school-age children.

Does Montessori Academy of Virginia-Suffolk accept child care subsidies?

The state record does not list it as accepting subsidies. Ask the provider directly.

What are Montessori Academy of Virginia-Suffolk's hours?

Monday to Friday, 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM. These are the hours on the state record. Holiday hours can differ.

How much does Montessori Academy of Virginia-Suffolk cost?

It has not listed its tuition. Call (757) 484-4902 to ask.

What is Montessori Academy of Virginia-Suffolk's phone number?

(757) 484-4902.

Where is Montessori Academy of Virginia-Suffolk?

5805 Harbourview Boulevard, Suffolk, VA 23435. The nearest other daycare we list is Children's Harbor - Suffolk, 0.4 miles away.

Sources: Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety (license and visits).