Skip to content
Child care center 

Miss Alyson's

7117 Ladysmith Road, Ruther Glen, VA 225464.0· 9 reviews
licensed capacity
31
open each week
5 days

We are a directory, not the daycare. We cannot hold a spot, enroll a child or answer questions about care.

Own this daycare? Claim it
Licensed by the stateInspection record

About

About Miss Alyson's

Miss Alyson's is a licensed child care center in Ruther Glen, Virginia. It is licensed by the state, for up to 31 children, serving toddlers, preschoolers and school-age children.

It is open Monday to Friday, 6:00 AM to 6:30 PM.

Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety made 12 visits in the last 3 years and cited 6 rules across 4 of them. The visit list, in the state's words, is below.

School-ageAccepts child care subsidyOpens before 7 AM

Ages served: toddlers, preschoolers and school-age children

From the state license
Ask when you call: rates, current openings, staff-to-child ratio and teacher qualifications.
Type
Child care center
Ages
Toddlers, preschoolers and school-age children
Hours today
Closed today
Licensed capacity
31 children

Hours

Hours

Monday6:00 AM to 6:30 PM
Tuesday6:00 AM to 6:30 PM
Wednesday6:00 AM to 6:30 PM
Thursday6:00 AM to 6:30 PM
Friday6:00 AM to 6:30 PM
SaturdayNot listed
SundayTodayNot listed
From the state license

Programs

Programs and care

AgesToddlers, preschoolers and school-age childrenFrom the state license
Child care subsidyAccepts state child care subsidiesFrom the state license
Licensed capacity31 childrenFrom the state license
A daycare without an item may still offer it; ask.

Cost

Tuition and costs

Miss Alyson's has not listed its tuition.

Ask the daycare for its ratesIt has not listed its tuition.

State record

Inspection reports for Miss Alyson's

License

Status
Licensed and operating
License type
License (Two Year)
Capacity
31 children
Ages
Toddlers, preschoolers and school-age children
License number
#1107037
See the state's record

Summary

12 visits in the last 3 years · Last visit Aug 27, 2026: no rules cited

Rules cited on 6 of 12 visits · 6 rules in all

  • Safety and hazards 3
  • Health, medication and illness 2
  • Records and paperwork 1

For comparison: 91% of Virginia daycares had at least one rule cited in the last 3 years; the typical daycare had 8.

A cited rule is what an inspector found on the day of a visit. It is not a rating of the daycare today.

Own this daycare? Add your response to the state record

See all 19 visits
  1. Aug 27, 2026InspectionNo rules cited
  2. Feb 24, 2026Inspection1 rule cited
    • Health, medication and illness

      8VAC20-780-40-M

      “The center shall maintain, in a way that is accessible to all staff who work with children, a current written list of all children's allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions documented in the allergy plan required in 8VAC20-780-60 A 8. This list shall be dated and kept confidential in each room or area where children are present. In Classroom A, the list containing children's allergies, sensitivities and restrictions, was posted on the cabinet, in the open for public viewing.”
  3. Aug 5, 2025InspectionNo rules cited
  4. Aug 4, 2025InspectionNo rules cited
  5. Jan 29, 2025InspectionNo rules cited
  6. Jan 24, 2025Inspection1 rule cited
    • Safety and hazards

      8VAC20-780-550-D

      “REPEAT VIOLATION The center shall implement a monthly practice evacuation drill. The evacuation drill log did not contain documentation of an evacuation drill for the month of September 2024. The director acknowledged a drill had not been documented for September 2024.”
  7. Aug 30, 2024InspectionNo rules cited
  8. Aug 30, 2024InspectionNo rules cited
  9. Jun 24, 2024Inspection2 rules cited
    • Health, medication and illness

      8VAC20-780-160-C

      “Based on review of five staff records, the center did not ensure one staff obtained and submitted the results of a follow-up tuberculosis screening at least every two years from the date of the initial screening. Evidence: The record of staff #5, employed 11/10/2014, contained documentation of a tuberculosis screening dated 01/18/2022, exceeding two years. The administrator stated a follow-up tuberculosis had not been obtained.”
    • Safety and hazards

      8VAC20-780-550-D

      “Based on review of the evacuation drill log and interview, the center did not implement a monthly practice evacuation drill. Evidence: The evacuation drill log did not contain documentation of an evacuation drill for the month of March 2024. The administrator acknowledged a drill had not been documented for March 2024.”
  10. Jun 24, 2024Inspection2 rules cited
    • Health, medication and illness

      8VAC20-780-160-C

      “Based on review of five staff records, the center did not ensure one staff obtained and submitted the results of a follow-up tuberculosis screening at least every two years from the date of the initial screening. Evidence: The record of staff #5, employed 11/10/2014, contained documentation of a tuberculosis screening dated 01/18/2022, exceeding two years. The administrator stated a follow-up tuberculosis had not been obtained.”
    • Safety and hazards

      8VAC20-780-550-D

      “Based on review of the evacuation drill log and interview, the center did not implement a monthly practice evacuation drill. Evidence: The evacuation drill log did not contain documentation of an evacuation drill for the month of March 2024. The administrator acknowledged a drill had not been documented for March 2024.”
Show 9 earlier visits
  1. Nov 6, 2023Inspection2 rules cited
    • Safety and hazards

      8VAC20-780-280-B

      “Based on observation, the center did not ensure hazardous substances such as cleaning materials were kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children. Evidence: A canister of sanitizer deodorizer was observed on an open shelf in the bathroom. The door of the bathroom was closed but not locked. Staff stated children did not use that bathroom.”
    • Records and paperwork

      8VAC20-780-70

      “Based on review of four staff records, the center did not obtain all required documentation for one staff record. Evidence: 1. The record of staff #2, employed 10/03/2023, contained one written reference dated 10/19/2023, exceeding the date of employment. The record did not contain a second reference as required by the standards. 2. Two or more references as to character and reputation are required to be checked before employment or volunteering.”
  2. Nov 6, 2023Inspection2 rules cited
    • Safety and hazards

      8VAC20-780-280-B

      “Based on observation, the center did not ensure hazardous substances such as cleaning materials were kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children. Evidence: A canister of sanitizer deodorizer was observed on an open shelf in the bathroom. The door of the bathroom was closed but not locked. Staff stated children did not use that bathroom.”
    • Records and paperwork

      8VAC20-780-70

      “Based on review of four staff records, the center did not obtain all required documentation for one staff record. Evidence: 1. The record of staff #2, employed 10/03/2023, contained one written reference dated 10/19/2023, exceeding the date of employment. The record did not contain a second reference as required by the standards. 2. Two or more references as to character and reputation are required to be checked before employment or volunteering.”
  3. Mar 27, 2023Inspection2 rules cited
    • Staff training and qualifications

      8VAC20-790-600-F

      “Based on review of four staff records, the center did not ensure one staff completed the department’s health & safety update course annually in addition to preservice, orientation and at least 16 hours of training. Evidence: The record of staff #2, contained documentation of completion of the department’s annual health & safety update training dated 10/18/2020. There was no documentation for the 2021 and 2022 year.”
    • Safety and hazards

      8VAC20-780-570-A

      “Based on observation and interview, the center did not ensure when a child is placed in an infant seat or highchair, the protective belt was fastened securely. Evidence: Child #7 was observed being feed in a highchair without the protective belt being fastened. Staff acknowledged the belt was not fastened.”
  4. Mar 27, 2023Inspection2 rules cited
    • Staff training and qualifications

      8VAC20-790-600-F

      “Based on review of four staff records, the center did not ensure one staff completed the department’s health & safety update course annually in addition to preservice, orientation and at least 16 hours of training. Evidence: The record of staff #2, contained documentation of completion of the department’s annual health & safety update training dated 10/18/2020. There was no documentation for the 2021 and 2022 year.”
    • Safety and hazards

      8VAC20-780-570-A

      “Based on observation and interview, the center did not ensure when a child is placed in an infant seat or highchair, the protective belt was fastened securely. Evidence: Child #7 was observed being feed in a highchair without the protective belt being fastened. Staff acknowledged the belt was not fastened.”
  5. Dec 6, 2022Complaint investigation2 rules cited
    • Supervision and ratios

      8VAC20-780-340-F Complaint related: Yes

      “Based on interview and video footage reviewed, the center did not ensure that children under 10 years of age always shall be within actual sight and sound supervision of staff. Evidence: On November 1, 2022, staff #1 and staff #2 assisted children into a wagon just outside the classroom door while staff #3 and staff #4 lined the remaining children up to go for a nature walk. Staff #1 stated she did not conduct a head count. While on the nature walk photos were taken of the children and posted on the Pro-care app for parents. At 10:35, The parent of child #1 texted the center and asked if her child was ok as she did not see him in any photos. Staff #1 stated at that point she did a head count and child #1 was not with the group. Staff #3 ran back to the classroom where she found Child #1 standing at the door. Staff #1, staff #2, staff #3 and staff #4 were unaware that Child #1 was left behind in the classroom until they were notified by the parent. It is estimated that Child #1 was out of sight and sound supervision for approximately 15 minutes.”
    • Supervision and ratios

      8VAC20-780-40-E Complaint related: Yes

      “Based on review of the center’s policies and procedures and interviews, the center did not ensure that the center’s activities and services were in compliance with the center’s own policies and procedures related to supervision that are required by the standards. Evidence: 1) During interviews, staff #1 reported that on 11/04/2022, during the transition from the classroom to the outdoors, Child #1, two-years old, was mistakenly left in the classroom unsupervised for approximately 15 minutes. Staff #1 reported that a name-to-face check was not completed upon exiting the classroom. Staff #1, staff #2, Staff #3 and staff #4 were unaware that Child #1 was left behind in the classroom. Staff #1 reported that at approximately 10:35 am, the parent of child #1 texted staff #1 asking if child #1 was ok as she did not see him in any photos that were being sent out of the nature walk. Staff #3 returned to the classroom where child #1 was waiting by the door. 2) The center’s Child Supervision Policy stated, ?Classroom teachers are responsible for the supervision and whereabouts of the children assigned to their care at all times, which entails conducting regular headcounts. Name to face head counts are to be done anytime the class is leaving the room to go outside to the playground, once on the playground and going on field trips to ensure no child is hiding or left behind. ?”
  6. Sep 21, 2022Inspection2 rules cited
    • Health, medication and illness

      8VAC20-780-510-G

      “Based on review of medication and interview, the facility did not ensure medication was labeled with the child’s name, the name of the medication, dosage amount, and the time or times to be given. Evidence: 1. Medication was observed in a Ziploc bag with the child’s name written on the bag, however the medication did not have the pharmacy label nor did it have the original container with information regarding the dosage, and times to be given. 2. The director stated they did not have the label or original container listing the required information.”
    • Safety and hazards

      8VAC20-780-550-B

      “Based upon review of the emergency preparedness plan (EPP), the facility has not ensured that the emergency preparedness plan includes all required procedural components. Evidence: 1. The EPP does not address the staff training requirement and the plan review and update. 2. The director stated the last review of the EPP was 08/02/2021.”
  7. Sep 21, 2022Inspection2 rules cited
    • Health, medication and illness

      8VAC20-780-510-G

      “Based on review of medication and interview, the facility did not ensure medication was labeled with the child’s name, the name of the medication, dosage amount, and the time or times to be given. Evidence: 1. Medication was observed in a Ziploc bag with the child’s name written on the bag, however the medication did not have the pharmacy label nor did it have the original container with information regarding the dosage, and times to be given. 2. The director stated they did not have the label or original container listing the required information.”
    • Safety and hazards

      8VAC20-780-550-B

      “Based upon review of the emergency preparedness plan (EPP), the facility has not ensured that the emergency preparedness plan includes all required procedural components. Evidence: 1. The EPP does not address the staff training requirement and the plan review and update. 2. The director stated the last review of the EPP was 08/02/2021.”
  8. Jun 7, 2022Inspection4 rules cited
    • Background checks

      8VAC20-770-60-C-2

      “Based on review of five staff records and interview, the center did not obtain a central registry finding for one staff within 30 days of employment. Evidence: 1. The record for staff #1, hired 03/09/2022, did not contain the results of a central registry finding. The record did not contain documentation that the central registry had been requested and the staff has been continuously employed. 2. The director stated that a central registry for Staff #1, had not been requested.”
    • Background checks

      8VAC20-770-40-D-6

      “Based on review of five staff records and interview, the center did not ensure a required sworn statement from an applicant, licensee, registrant, or other person required to obtain background checks was not dated more than 90 days prior to the date of employment, volunteering, residing in the home. Evidence: 1. The record for staff #1, hired 03/09/2022, had documentation of a sworn statement dated 08/31/2021,exceeding 90 days prior to hire. 2. The director stated, staff #1 was delayed in staring employment and an updated sworn statement was not completed at the time of employment.”
    • Background checks

      22.1-289.035-B-2

      “Based on a review of five staff records and interview, the center did not ensure one staff member completed a national fingerprint check prior to the first day of employment and within the required time frame. Evidence: 1. The national fingerprint check for Staff #1, hired on 03/09/2022, was dated 09/02/2021 exceeding 90 days prior to employment. 2. The director reported Staff #1 was delayed in starting employment and a new fingerprints background check was not completed prior to hire.”
    • Records and paperwork

      8VAC20-780-70

      “Based on review of five staff records and interview, the center did not obtain all required documentation for one staff record. Evidence: 1. The record of staff #1, hired 03/09/2022, did not have documentation of two or more references as to the character and reputation as well as competency that were checked before employment. 2.The director stated two references for staff #1 had not been obtained.”
  9. Jun 7, 2022Inspection4 rules cited
    • Background checks

      8VAC20-770-60-C-2

      “Based on review of five staff records and interview, the center did not obtain a central registry finding for one staff within 30 days of employment. Evidence: 1. The record for staff #1, hired 03/09/2022, did not contain the results of a central registry finding. The record did not contain documentation that the central registry had been requested and the staff has been continuously employed. 2. The director stated that a central registry for Staff #1, had not been requested.”
    • Background checks

      8VAC20-770-40-D-6

      “Based on review of five staff records and interview, the center did not ensure a required sworn statement from an applicant, licensee, registrant, or other person required to obtain background checks was not dated more than 90 days prior to the date of employment, volunteering, residing in the home. Evidence: 1. The record for staff #1, hired 03/09/2022, had documentation of a sworn statement dated 08/31/2021,exceeding 90 days prior to hire. 2. The director stated, staff #1 was delayed in staring employment and an updated sworn statement was not completed at the time of employment.”
    • Background checks

      22.1-289.035-B-2

      “Based on a review of five staff records and interview, the center did not ensure one staff member completed a national fingerprint check prior to the first day of employment and within the required time frame. Evidence: 1. The national fingerprint check for Staff #1, hired on 03/09/2022, was dated 09/02/2021 exceeding 90 days prior to employment. 2. The director reported Staff #1 was delayed in starting employment and a new fingerprints background check was not completed prior to hire.”
    • Records and paperwork

      8VAC20-780-70

      “Based on review of five staff records and interview, the center did not obtain all required documentation for one staff record. Evidence: 1. The record of staff #1, hired 03/09/2022, did not have documentation of two or more references as to the character and reputation as well as competency that were checked before employment. 2.The director stated two references for staff #1 had not been obtained.”

Copied from Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety on October 2, 2026; the state's records start around Oct 2012. Rule wording, severity and dates are the state's.

Reviews

Parent reviews

No parent reviews yet

If your child goes or went here, your review helps other parents. We check every review against our review guidelines.

Your rating

Daycares near Miss Alyson's

FAQ

Questions about Miss Alyson's

Is Miss Alyson's licensed?

Yes. Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety lists it as licensed and operating.

When was Miss Alyson's last inspected?

Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety lists the most recent visit on August 27, 2026, with no rules cited. It lists 12 visits in the last 3 years.

Has Miss Alyson's had rules cited by the state?

Yes. Inspectors cited 6 rules across 6 of 12 visits in the last 3 years. For comparison: 91% of Virginia daycares had at least one rule cited in the last 3 years; the typical daycare had 8. A cited rule is what an inspector found on the day of a visit. It is not a rating of the daycare today.

How many children can Miss Alyson's care for?

31, the licensed capacity on the state record. It is licensed to serve toddlers, preschoolers and school-age children.

Does Miss Alyson's accept child care subsidies?

Yes. The state record says it accepts child care subsidies.

What are Miss Alyson's' hours?

Monday to Friday, 6:00 AM to 6:30 PM. These are the hours on the state record. Holiday hours can differ.

How much does Miss Alyson's cost?

It has not listed its tuition. Call (804) 448-5838 to ask.

What is Miss Alyson's' phone number?

(804) 448-5838.

Where is Miss Alyson's?

7117 Ladysmith Road, Ruther Glen, VA 22546. The nearest other daycare we list is Miss Alyson's, 0.3 miles away.

Sources: Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety (license and visits).