YMCA Early Learning Center at Sentara Martha Jefferson
475 Martha Jefferson Drive, Charlottesville, VA
We are a directory, not the daycare. We cannot hold a spot, enroll a child or answer questions about care.
Own this daycare? Claim itAbout
Lighthouse Worship Center is a child care center in Charlottesville, Virginia. It is license-exempt, for up to 70 children, serving infants, toddlers and preschoolers.
It is open Monday to Friday, 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM. It describes a Faith-based approach.
Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety made 8 visits in the last 3 years and cited 10 rules across 6 of them. The visit list, in the state's words, is below.
Hours
| Monday | 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM |
| Wednesday | 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM |
| Thursday | 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM |
| Friday | 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM |
| Saturday | Not listed |
| SundayToday | Not listed |
Programs
| Ages | Infants, toddlers and preschoolersFrom the state license |
|---|---|
| Approach | Faith-based (Christian) |
| Safety | State of the art access control system preventing entry by non-associated individuals |
| Licensed capacity | 70 childrenFrom the state license |
Cost
Lighthouse Worship Center has not listed its tuition.
State record
8 visits in the last 3 years · Last visit Feb 25, 2026: 2 rules cited
Rules cited on 8 of 8 visits · 10 rules in all
For comparison: 91% of Virginia daycares had at least one rule cited in the last 3 years; the typical daycare had 8.
A cited rule is what an inspector found on the day of a visit. It is not a rating of the daycare today.
Own this daycare? Add your response to the state record
22.1-289.035-B-4
“The center is required to obtain background checks from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years. The center did not request a search of the child abuse and neglect registry and sex offender from one state for Staff #4, who has been employed for more than six months and was working with children at the time of the inspection.”
22.1-289.035-B-3
“REPEAT VIOLATION The center must request a search of the central registry prior to the employee's first day of employment. Staff #1, who had been employed for 3 weeks, did not have a central registry search sent as of the day of the inspection. Staff #3, who had been employed for 3 months, with the central registry being returned two months after hire. Staff #4, who had been employed for 7 months, with the central registry being returned two months after hire. Staff #5, who had been employed for 6 weeks, did not have a central registry search returned within the 30 days required and was not requested prior to hire. Staff #7, who had been employed for 4 weeks, did not have a central registry search returned within the 30 days required and was not requested prior to hire. Staff #1, who had been employed for 3 weeks, did not have a central registry search sent as of the day of the inspection. Staff #9, who had been employed for 5 months, did not have a central registry search returned within the 30 days required and was not requested prior to hire.”
22.1-289.035-B-3
“For staff hired before July 1, 2024, providers must obtain the results of a central registry search for an employee, within 30 days of service. Caregiver #1 did not have central registry search results during the inspection and has been employed for over 5 months. The CPS check was not sent off prior to hire. Caregivers #6 and 7 did not have central registry search results during the inspection and has been employed for over 4 ? months. The CPS check was not sent off prior to hire. Caregiver #9 did not have central registry search results during the inspection and has been employed for over 11 months. The CPS check was not sent off prior to hire.”
22.1-289.035-B-3
“For staff hired before July 1, 2024, providers must obtain the results of a central registry search for an employee, within 30 days of service. Caregiver #1 did not have central registry search results during the inspection and has been employed for over 5 months. The CPS check was not sent off prior to hire. Caregivers #6 and 7 did not have central registry search results during the inspection and has been employed for over 4 ? months. The CPS check was not sent off prior to hire. Caregiver #9 did not have central registry search results during the inspection and has been employed for over 11 months. The CPS check was not sent off prior to hire.”
22.1-289.031-A-9
“Based on observation, the center failed to stay in compliance with all safe sleep guidelines recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Evidence: 1. An infant was observed sleeping in a swing with a blanket in the Jungle Room. 2. The American Academy of Pediatrics state: -If your baby falls asleep in a car seat, stroller, swing, infant carrier or sling, you should move them to a firm sleep surface on their back as soon as possible. -Keep soft objects & loose bedding out of your baby's sleep area. These objects can increase your baby's risk of entrapment, suffocation or strangulation. This includes pillows and pillow-like toys, quilts, comforters, mattress toppers, non-fitted sheets, blankets, toys, bumper pads or related products that attach to crib slats or sides.”
22.1-289.031-A-9
“Based on observation, the center failed to stay in compliance with all safe sleep guidelines recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Evidence: 1. An infant was observed sleeping in a swing with a blanket in the Jungle Room. 2. The American Academy of Pediatrics state: -If your baby falls asleep in a car seat, stroller, swing, infant carrier or sling, you should move them to a firm sleep surface on their back as soon as possible. -Keep soft objects & loose bedding out of your baby's sleep area. These objects can increase your baby's risk of entrapment, suffocation or strangulation. This includes pillows and pillow-like toys, quilts, comforters, mattress toppers, non-fitted sheets, blankets, toys, bumper pads or related products that attach to crib slats or sides.”
22.1-289.031-A-5-c Complaint related: No
“Based on interview and observation of video recording, the center failed to report a suspected case of child abuse. Evidence: 1. A witness reported that on 11/09/2023 she observed a staff member roughly grab a child by the arm and shoulder and forcefully ?slammed? him/her down on the ground beside her. 2. A video recording taken on 11/09/2023 corroborates this report and shows that another staff person witnessed the incident. 3. The director stated none of the staff reported the incident.”
22.1-289.031-B-2 Complaint related: No
“Based on interview and observation of video recording, the center failed to implement the center’s procedures for appropriate supervision of children. Evidence: 1. On 11/09/2023 an individual that lives across the street from the center heard yelling and went outside. She witnessed a staff member yelling at a child ?Say no now; I didn?t think so!?. The individual stated the staff person then roughly grabbed the child by the arm and shoulder and forcefully ?slammed? him/her down on the ground beside her. The individual recorded the incident which corroborates her statement. 2. The director stated the staff are frequently trained on not putting their hands on the children and not yelling at the children. 3. The employee handbook lists the following procedures regarding appropriate supervision: Under standards of conduct #1. Employee will reflect a POSITIVE, LOVING, Christ-like attitude toward children, parents, co-workers, and administration. Under Classroom Management #5. Employees should keep voice level down so as not to disturb other classrooms. Under Forbidden Action- The following actions or threats thereof are forbidden: #1. Physical punishment, striking a child, roughly handling, or shaking a child, restricting movement through binding, or tying, forcing a child to assume an uncomfortable position, or exercise as punishment.”
8VAC20-770-40-D-2 Complaint related: No
“Based on record review and interview, the center failed to have a completed central registry record check ( CPS ) by the end of the 30th day of employment for two staff. Evidence: 1. The record for staff 1 documents the hire date as 4/25/23. The date of the inspection(11/13/23) the record did not contain the results of the CPS finding. 2. The record for staff 2 documents the hire date as 7/28/22. The date of the inspection(11/13/23) the record did not contain the results of the CPS finding 3. The administrator stated both background checks were completed but not followed up on and the results were never received.”
22.1-289.031-A-3-d Complaint related: No
“Based on interview, the center failed to maintain the required ratio of one staff to ten children ages 36 months to five years. Evidence: Staff 1 reported that on 11/08/2023 the ratio for the class was 2 staff to 13 children all age three. Staff 1 stated that staff 2 left the room to go assist another teacher leaving the ratio at 1 staff to 13 children, three years of age.”
22.1-289.031-B-2 Complaint related: No
“Based on interview, the center failed to implement the center’s procedures for appropriate supervision of all children in care. Evidence: 1. Staff 1 reported on 11/8/ 2023 there were 13 three-year-old's with herself and staff 2. Staff 2 left the room without telling her why and left the door open. When she returned, they began putting coats on children and realized child 1 was missing. Staff 1 went into the hall and was child 1 with the director and the child’s mother at the door. Staff 1 believes child 1 was gone about five minutes. 2. The director stated the child’s mother was dropping off diapers and found him at the side of the building on the picnic tables and brought him in. 3. Staff 1 stated the center’s procedures are for the classroom door to always stay closed and for staff to never leave a room out of ratio and unsupervised. Staff 2 said she was relieving another teacher to go to the restroom. The center’s procedures are to call the front office to get relieved to go to the restroom. 4. The director stated the center’s procedures are for the classroom door to always stay closed and staff to never leave a room out of ratio. Staff are to call the front office to get relieved to go to the restroom.”
22.1-289.031-A-3-a Complaint related: No
“Based on interview and observation, the center failed to ensure the required ratio of one staff to four children for children ages zero to sixteen months. Evidence: In the Rainbow room only one staff member was observed with eight children. The assistant director verified the youngest child in the class was 10 months.”
22.1-289.031-A-5-c Complaint related: No
“Based on interview and observation of video recording, the center failed to report a suspected case of child abuse. Evidence: 1. A witness reported that on 11/09/2023 she observed a staff member roughly grab a child by the arm and shoulder and forcefully ?slammed? him/her down on the ground beside her. 2. A video recording taken on 11/09/2023 corroborates this report and shows that another staff person witnessed the incident. 3. The director stated none of the staff reported the incident.”
22.1-289.031-B-2 Complaint related: No
“Based on interview and observation of video recording, the center failed to implement the center’s procedures for appropriate supervision of children. Evidence: 1. On 11/09/2023 an individual that lives across the street from the center heard yelling and went outside. She witnessed a staff member yelling at a child ?Say no now; I didn?t think so!?. The individual stated the staff person then roughly grabbed the child by the arm and shoulder and forcefully ?slammed? him/her down on the ground beside her. The individual recorded the incident which corroborates her statement. 2. The director stated the staff are frequently trained on not putting their hands on the children and not yelling at the children. 3. The employee handbook lists the following procedures regarding appropriate supervision: Under standards of conduct #1. Employee will reflect a POSITIVE, LOVING, Christ-like attitude toward children, parents, co-workers, and administration. Under Classroom Management #5. Employees should keep voice level down so as not to disturb other classrooms. Under Forbidden Action- The following actions or threats thereof are forbidden: #1. Physical punishment, striking a child, roughly handling, or shaking a child, restricting movement through binding, or tying, forcing a child to assume an uncomfortable position, or exercise as punishment.”
8VAC20-770-40-D-2 Complaint related: No
“Based on record review and interview, the center failed to have a completed central registry record check ( CPS ) by the end of the 30th day of employment for two staff. Evidence: 1. The record for staff 1 documents the hire date as 4/25/23. The date of the inspection(11/13/23) the record did not contain the results of the CPS finding. 2. The record for staff 2 documents the hire date as 7/28/22. The date of the inspection(11/13/23) the record did not contain the results of the CPS finding 3. The administrator stated both background checks were completed but not followed up on and the results were never received.”
22.1-289.031-A-3-d Complaint related: No
“Based on interview, the center failed to maintain the required ratio of one staff to ten children ages 36 months to five years. Evidence: Staff 1 reported that on 11/08/2023 the ratio for the class was 2 staff to 13 children all age three. Staff 1 stated that staff 2 left the room to go assist another teacher leaving the ratio at 1 staff to 13 children, three years of age.”
22.1-289.031-B-2 Complaint related: No
“Based on interview, the center failed to implement the center’s procedures for appropriate supervision of all children in care. Evidence: 1. Staff 1 reported on 11/8/ 2023 there were 13 three-year-old's with herself and staff 2. Staff 2 left the room without telling her why and left the door open. When she returned, they began putting coats on children and realized child 1 was missing. Staff 1 went into the hall and was child 1 with the director and the child’s mother at the door. Staff 1 believes child 1 was gone about five minutes. 2. The director stated the child’s mother was dropping off diapers and found him at the side of the building on the picnic tables and brought him in. 3. Staff 1 stated the center’s procedures are for the classroom door to always stay closed and for staff to never leave a room out of ratio and unsupervised. Staff 2 said she was relieving another teacher to go to the restroom. The center’s procedures are to call the front office to get relieved to go to the restroom. 4. The director stated the center’s procedures are for the classroom door to always stay closed and staff to never leave a room out of ratio. Staff are to call the front office to get relieved to go to the restroom.”
22.1-289.031-A-3-a Complaint related: No
“Based on interview and observation, the center failed to ensure the required ratio of one staff to four children for children ages zero to sixteen months. Evidence: In the Rainbow room only one staff member was observed with eight children. The assistant director verified the youngest child in the class was 10 months.”
22.1-289.031-A-5-c Complaint related: No
“Based on interview and observation of video recording, the center failed to report a suspected case of child abuse. Evidence: 1. A witness reported that on 11/09/2023 she observed a staff member roughly grab a child by the arm and shoulder and forcefully ?slammed? him/her down on the ground beside her. 2. A video recording taken on 11/09/2023 corroborates this report and shows that another staff person witnessed the incident. 3. The director stated none of the staff reported the incident.”
22.1-289.031-B-2 Complaint related: No
“Based on interview and observation of video recording, the center failed to implement the center’s procedures for appropriate supervision of children. Evidence: 1. On 11/09/2023 an individual that lives across the street from the center heard yelling and went outside. She witnessed a staff member yelling at a child ?Say no now; I didn?t think so!?. The individual stated the staff person then roughly grabbed the child by the arm and shoulder and forcefully ?slammed? him/her down on the ground beside her. The individual recorded the incident which corroborates her statement. 2. The director stated the staff are frequently trained on not putting their hands on the children and not yelling at the children. 3. The employee handbook lists the following procedures regarding appropriate supervision: Under standards of conduct #1. Employee will reflect a POSITIVE, LOVING, Christ-like attitude toward children, parents, co-workers, and administration. Under Classroom Management #5. Employees should keep voice level down so as not to disturb other classrooms. Under Forbidden Action- The following actions or threats thereof are forbidden: #1. Physical punishment, striking a child, roughly handling, or shaking a child, restricting movement through binding, or tying, forcing a child to assume an uncomfortable position, or exercise as punishment.”
8VAC20-770-40-D-2 Complaint related: No
“Based on record review and interview, the center failed to have a completed central registry record check ( CPS ) by the end of the 30th day of employment for two staff. Evidence: 1. The record for staff 1 documents the hire date as 4/25/23. The date of the inspection(11/13/23) the record did not contain the results of the CPS finding. 2. The record for staff 2 documents the hire date as 7/28/22. The date of the inspection(11/13/23) the record did not contain the results of the CPS finding 3. The administrator stated both background checks were completed but not followed up on and the results were never received.”
22.1-289.031-A-3-d Complaint related: No
“Based on interview, the center failed to maintain the required ratio of one staff to ten children ages 36 months to five years. Evidence: Staff 1 reported that on 11/08/2023 the ratio for the class was 2 staff to 13 children all age three. Staff 1 stated that staff 2 left the room to go assist another teacher leaving the ratio at 1 staff to 13 children, three years of age.”
22.1-289.031-B-2 Complaint related: No
“Based on interview, the center failed to implement the center’s procedures for appropriate supervision of all children in care. Evidence: 1. Staff 1 reported on 11/8/ 2023 there were 13 three-year-old's with herself and staff 2. Staff 2 left the room without telling her why and left the door open. When she returned, they began putting coats on children and realized child 1 was missing. Staff 1 went into the hall and was child 1 with the director and the child’s mother at the door. Staff 1 believes child 1 was gone about five minutes. 2. The director stated the child’s mother was dropping off diapers and found him at the side of the building on the picnic tables and brought him in. 3. Staff 1 stated the center’s procedures are for the classroom door to always stay closed and for staff to never leave a room out of ratio and unsupervised. Staff 2 said she was relieving another teacher to go to the restroom. The center’s procedures are to call the front office to get relieved to go to the restroom. 4. The director stated the center’s procedures are for the classroom door to always stay closed and staff to never leave a room out of ratio. Staff are to call the front office to get relieved to go to the restroom.”
22.1-289.031-A-3-a Complaint related: No
“Based on interview and observation, the center failed to ensure the required ratio of one staff to four children for children ages zero to sixteen months. Evidence: In the Rainbow room only one staff member was observed with eight children. The assistant director verified the youngest child in the class was 10 months.”
63.2-1509-A Complaint related: Yes
“Based on interview, the center failed to report suspected child abuse or neglect immediately to the local department of social services of the county or city wherein the child reside or wherein the abuse or neglect is believed to have occurred or to the Department's toll-free child abuse and neglect hotline. Evidence: 1. Per written statement from staff 1: ?2/9/22 Noticed bruising around the private area and large bruise on face. Had not been to school since Thursday of proceeding week. Would not play or engage. Screamed unless being held. Reported to management." " 2/10/22 Noticed additional bruising on ribs. Reported to management. Screaming/crying all day unless being held. Frightened and combative during diaper changes." "2/11/22 Additional bruising spotted on arm and management pointed out faint bruising around eye." 2. Per interview with staff 1 on 3/2/22: Staff 1 stated she was told by staff 2 on 2/9/22 to not call to report the suspicion of child abuse since the CASA worker was due to come on 2/11/22. Staff 2 told staff 1 they would talk to the CASA worker at that time about reporting. Staff 2 told staff 1 to continue to document everything until the CASA worker came on the 11th. Staff 1 stated she told the CASA worker her concerns on the 11th and then staff 1 called and reported her suspicions to DSS. 3. Per interview with staff 2 on 3/2/22: Staff 2 stated staff 1 advised her of the bruising on the child's bottom, legs and cheek on 2/9/22 and 2/10/22. The CASA worker was scheduled to visit the child on 2/11/22. Staff 1 told staff 2 the child told her the bruise on her face came from her mother but when staff 2 asked the child said she fell. Staff 2 stated, ?I just did not feel like I had been around the child enough to make that call.? 4. Per interview with CASA worker 3/2/22: Upon arrival staff 2 advised the CASA worker of her concerns regarding the child's bruises. The CASA worker entered the classroom and staff 1 immediately took the CASA worker to the side and told her about how concerned she was. The CASA worker spoke with her supervisor and they called and reported to DSS that day.”
22.1-289.031-B-5
“Based on interview, the center failed to establish and implement a procedure to ensure that all areas of the premises accessible to children are free of obvious injury hazards. Evidence: 1. In room B, a bottle of hand sanitizer was on the teacher's desk accessible to children in care. The bottle contained a statement to keep out of reach of children. 2. The director stated all hazardous substances are to be kept out of reach of children or in the kitchen. 3. The wood play structure outside has a section that is blocked off preventing children access due to hazardous issues. The other section that is attached, has peeling paint and the wood platforms are splintering. Per a previous inspection and violation plans have been in place to repair the structure since 2018. 4. The director stated the children have still been playing on the structure and they still have plans on replacing the structure. She stated she was unaware of the previous violation.”
22.1-289.035-B-4
“Based on record review and interview, the center failed to obtain an out of state child abuse and neglect search request by the end of the 30th day of employment for each state the new employee resided in the past five years prior to the 1st day of employment. Evidence: 1. The record for staff 1 documents the hire date as 11/22/21. The sworn statement documents staff 1 lived in Ohio within five years prior to the first date of employment. There is no Ohio central registry search in staff 1's record. 2. The administrator stated the center failed to obtain an Ohio central registry for staff 1.”
22.1-289.031-B-1
“Based on interview, the center failed to implement the center's procedure for hand washing by staff and children before eating and after diapering. Evidence: 1. Diapering and lunch was observed in room A. Staff 4 changed a child's diaper and then set the child at the table for lunch. Staff 4 then sat at the table and fed that child and another child lunch. Staff 4 did not wash her hands or the child's hands that she just changed after diapering or before feeding the children. 2. The director stated the procedure for handwashing is for staff to wash their hands after diapering and to clean children's hands with a wipe. The procedure is for staff to wash their hands before feeding children and to wash children's hands before they eat.”
63.2-1509-A Complaint related: Yes
“Based on interview, the center failed to report suspected child abuse or neglect immediately to the local department of social services of the county or city wherein the child reside or wherein the abuse or neglect is believed to have occurred or to the Department's toll-free child abuse and neglect hotline. Evidence: 1. Per written statement from staff 1: ?2/9/22 Noticed bruising around the private area and large bruise on face. Had not been to school since Thursday of proceeding week. Would not play or engage. Screamed unless being held. Reported to management." " 2/10/22 Noticed additional bruising on ribs. Reported to management. Screaming/crying all day unless being held. Frightened and combative during diaper changes." "2/11/22 Additional bruising spotted on arm and management pointed out faint bruising around eye." 2. Per interview with staff 1 on 3/2/22: Staff 1 stated she was told by staff 2 on 2/9/22 to not call to report the suspicion of child abuse since the CASA worker was due to come on 2/11/22. Staff 2 told staff 1 they would talk to the CASA worker at that time about reporting. Staff 2 told staff 1 to continue to document everything until the CASA worker came on the 11th. Staff 1 stated she told the CASA worker her concerns on the 11th and then staff 1 called and reported her suspicions to DSS. 3. Per interview with staff 2 on 3/2/22: Staff 2 stated staff 1 advised her of the bruising on the child's bottom, legs and cheek on 2/9/22 and 2/10/22. The CASA worker was scheduled to visit the child on 2/11/22. Staff 1 told staff 2 the child told her the bruise on her face came from her mother but when staff 2 asked the child said she fell. Staff 2 stated, ?I just did not feel like I had been around the child enough to make that call.? 4. Per interview with CASA worker 3/2/22: Upon arrival staff 2 advised the CASA worker of her concerns regarding the child's bruises. The CASA worker entered the classroom and staff 1 immediately took the CASA worker to the side and told her about how concerned she was. The CASA worker spoke with her supervisor and they called and reported to DSS that day.”
22.1-289.031-B-5
“Based on interview, the center failed to establish and implement a procedure to ensure that all areas of the premises accessible to children are free of obvious injury hazards. Evidence: 1. In room B, a bottle of hand sanitizer was on the teacher's desk accessible to children in care. The bottle contained a statement to keep out of reach of children. 2. The director stated all hazardous substances are to be kept out of reach of children or in the kitchen. 3. The wood play structure outside has a section that is blocked off preventing children access due to hazardous issues. The other section that is attached, has peeling paint and the wood platforms are splintering. Per a previous inspection and violation plans have been in place to repair the structure since 2018. 4. The director stated the children have still been playing on the structure and they still have plans on replacing the structure. She stated she was unaware of the previous violation.”
22.1-289.035-B-4
“Based on record review and interview, the center failed to obtain an out of state child abuse and neglect search request by the end of the 30th day of employment for each state the new employee resided in the past five years prior to the 1st day of employment. Evidence: 1. The record for staff 1 documents the hire date as 11/22/21. The sworn statement documents staff 1 lived in Ohio within five years prior to the first date of employment. There is no Ohio central registry search in staff 1's record. 2. The administrator stated the center failed to obtain an Ohio central registry for staff 1.”
22.1-289.031-B-1
“Based on interview, the center failed to implement the center's procedure for hand washing by staff and children before eating and after diapering. Evidence: 1. Diapering and lunch was observed in room A. Staff 4 changed a child's diaper and then set the child at the table for lunch. Staff 4 then sat at the table and fed that child and another child lunch. Staff 4 did not wash her hands or the child's hands that she just changed after diapering or before feeding the children. 2. The director stated the procedure for handwashing is for staff to wash their hands after diapering and to clean children's hands with a wipe. The procedure is for staff to wash their hands before feeding children and to wash children's hands before they eat.”
Reviews
If your child goes or went here, your review helps other parents. We check every review against our review guidelines.
475 Martha Jefferson Drive, Charlottesville, VA
1550-1562 Insurance Lane, Charlottesville, VA
Earlysville, VA 22936 · infants to school-age · Home daycare: the provider shares the address with families
1610 Regent Street, Charlottesville, VA
3375 Berkmar Drive, Charlottesville, VA
1500 Rio Road East, Charlottesville, VA
1025 Rio Road East, Charlottesville, VA
1550 Seminole Trail, Charlottesville, VA
1205 Pen Park Road, Charlottesville, VA
FAQ
No. Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety lists it as exempt from child care licensing in Virginia.
Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety lists the most recent visit on February 25, 2026, with 2 rules cited. It lists 8 visits in the last 3 years.
Yes. Inspectors cited 10 rules across 8 of 8 visits in the last 3 years. For comparison: 91% of Virginia daycares had at least one rule cited in the last 3 years; the typical daycare had 8. A cited rule is what an inspector found on the day of a visit. It is not a rating of the daycare today.
70, the licensed capacity on the state record. It is licensed to serve infants, toddlers and preschoolers.
The state record does not list it as accepting subsidies. Ask the provider directly.
Monday to Friday, 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM. These are the hours on the state record. Holiday hours can differ.
It has not listed its tuition. Call (434) 973-7557 to ask.
(434) 973-7557.
3464 Worth Crossing, Charlottesville, VA 22911.