Lighthouse Preschool & Daycare

22.1-289.011-F

“**** REPEAT VIOLATION**** Based on observation and interview. the licensee did not ensure that documents required by the Superintendent were posted in a conspicuous place on the licensed premises. Evidence: The most recently issued violation notice from the previous inspection was not posted conspicuously in the center. The violation notice was located under the Summary page of the Inspection Report and the entire Inspection Report was closed behind a glass display window. The violation notice was not visible. Staff confirmed during the inspection that the violation notice was not visible at the time of the inspection.”

22.1-289.035-B-4

“*** REPEAT VIOLATION *** Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not always obtain a copy of the results of a criminal history record information check, a sex offender registry check, and a search of the child abuse and neglect registry or equivalent registry from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years. Evidence: Five staff records were reviewed. The record for staff #5 (employed 8/25/2023) whose sworn disclosure statement documented that staff #5 resided in the states of South Carolina and Texas in the previous 5 years, did not contain the results of a Criminal Record Check for the States of South Carolina and Texas. Staff #5 was working in ratio with children on 8/28/2023 during the inspection. The program director confirmed that she was unable to locate the South Carolina or the Texas Criminal Record Checks or a copy of the criminal record Check requests for staff #5.”

8VAC20-780-70

“Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not always keep a staff record containing all of the required documentation for each staff person. Evidence: Five staff records were reviewed. The record for staff #4 (employed 8/15/2023) did not contain documentation that two or more references as to character and reputation as well as competency were checked before employment or volunteering. The record for staff #5 contained a written statement next to the listed reference names that they were "verified" but did not include the following required information: Dates of contact; Results; and Signature of person making the call. The program director confirmed that this documentation was not present in the records for staff #4 and #5.”

22.1-289.011-F

“Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not ensure that documents required by the Superintendent were posted in a conspicuous place on the licensed premises. Evidence: The most recently issued violation notice from the previous inspection was not posted conspicuously in the center. The program director confirmed that the violation notice was not posted at the time of the inspection.”

22.1-289.035-B-4

“*** REPEAT VIOLATION *** Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not always obtain a copy of the results of a criminal history record information check, a sex offender registry check, and a search of the child abuse and neglect registry or equivalent registry from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years. Evidence: Five staff records were reviewed. The record for staff #5 (employed 8/25/2023) whose sworn disclosure statement documented that staff #5 resided in the states of South Carolina and Texas in the previous 5 years, did not contain the results of a Criminal Record Check for the States of South Carolina and Texas. Staff #5 was working in ratio with children on 8/28/2023 during the inspection. The program director confirmed that she was unable to locate the South Carolina or the Texas Criminal Record Checks or a copy of the criminal record Check requests for staff #5.”

8VAC20-780-70

“Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not always keep a staff record containing all of the required documentation for each staff person. Evidence: Five staff records were reviewed. The record for staff #4 (employed 8/15/2023) did not contain documentation that two or more references as to character and reputation as well as competency were checked before employment or volunteering. The record for staff #5 contained a written statement next to the listed reference names that they were "verified" but did not include the following required information: Dates of contact; Results; and Signature of person making the call. The program director confirmed that this documentation was not present in the records for staff #4 and #5.”

22.1-289.011-F

“Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not ensure that documents required by the Superintendent were posted in a conspicuous place on the licensed premises. Evidence: The most recently issued violation notice from the previous inspection was not posted conspicuously in the center. The program director confirmed that the violation notice was not posted at the time of the inspection.”

22.1-289.035-B-4

“*** REPEAT VIOLATION *** Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not always obtain a copy of the results of a criminal history record information check, a sex offender registry check, and a search of the child abuse and neglect registry or equivalent registry from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years. Evidence: Five staff records were reviewed. The record for staff #5 (employed 8/25/2023) whose sworn disclosure statement documented that staff #5 resided in the states of South Carolina and Texas in the previous 5 years, did not contain the results of a Criminal Record Check for the States of South Carolina and Texas. Staff #5 was working in ratio with children on 8/28/2023 during the inspection. The program director confirmed that she was unable to locate the South Carolina or the Texas Criminal Record Checks or a copy of the criminal record Check requests for staff #5.”

8VAC20-780-70

“Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not always keep a staff record containing all of the required documentation for each staff person. Evidence: Five staff records were reviewed. The record for staff #4 (employed 8/15/2023) did not contain documentation that two or more references as to character and reputation as well as competency were checked before employment or volunteering. The record for staff #5 contained a written statement next to the listed reference names that they were "verified" but did not include the following required information: Dates of contact; Results; and Signature of person making the call. The program director confirmed that this documentation was not present in the records for staff #4 and #5.”

22.1-289.011-F

“Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not ensure that documents required by the Superintendent were posted in a conspicuous place on the licensed premises. Evidence: The most recently issued violation notice from the previous inspection was not posted conspicuously in the center. The program director confirmed that the violation notice was not posted at the time of the inspection.”

8VAC20-780-40-E

“***REPEAT VIOLATION*** Based on interviews and a review of written policies and procedures, the licensee did not always ensure that the center's activities, services, and facilities were maintained in compliance with the Standards for Licensed Child Day Centers and the center's own policies and procedures that are required by these standards. Evidence: 1. On the afternoon of 6/14/2023, 2 two-year old children were left alone and unsupervised on the playground when staff failed to follow the center’s own written playground safety polices. 2. The center’s written ?SOP for Outside Play? states that ?Staff must complete a name to face every 15 minutes during outside play. Staff must check off children and write the time on the name to face sheet?. 3. When asked if a ?name to face? check was conducted using the written list of children’s names to confirm that all the children were accounted for, staff #1, staff #2 and staff #3 confirmed that they did not call individual children’s names from their name to face sheet and that they did not use that list to look for each individual child. Each of the three staff confirmed that they only counted the total number of children present on the playground and again as they entered the building. 4. The program’s written playground plan states that ?Staff must ensure that any children that join their group are added to the name to face sheet and to their classroom app at all times?. a. Two of the 3 staff caring for child #1 and child #2 on the afternoon of 6/14/2023 recalled that 6 children from their group were taken to the ?pre-tod’s? classroom. The third staff recalled that 2 or 3 children went to the ?pre-tod’s? classroom. b. The ?pre-tod’s name to face sheet did not contain the names of any of the children brought to this room on the afternoon of 6/14/2023, nor did the two and three year old name to face sheets reflect that some children left this group and went to the Pre-tods? classroom on 6/14/2023. c. The final remaining staff present on 6/14/2023 in the front room, where child #1 and child #2 are normally cared for in the afternoon, stated ?I did not know the children were missing until their parents arrived - I thought they were in Tod’s?. 5. The program’s written playground plan states that "There is to be no more than 1 class on the playground? at a time?? Interviews with staff #1, staff #2, and staff #3 confirm that the two-year-old group and the 3- to 4-year-old group were both outside on the large playground at the same time on the afternoon of 6/14/2023. 6. Administrative Staff #5 stated that Staff #1 and Staff #2 ?broke policy?they combined classes and went outside. We do not allow 2 classes on the playground at one time. They did not keep track of these two [children]. They did not complete the required record keeping and they did not follow sight and sound supervision.?”

8VAC20-780-350-F

“Based on interviews and a review of policies, the center did not implement their own required written policy and procedure that describes how the center will ensure that each group of children receives care by consistent staff or team of staff members. Evidence: 1. The program’s written ?Consistency / Continuity Plan? says ?Upon hire, staff will be assigned to a classroom/team?. This will foster consistency in care and the development of teacher/student bonds and strengthen staff/parent relations.? 2. Administrative staff #5 stated that ?Staff cannot switch classes at will. [Staff #3] was assigned to class 1, [Staff #1] to class 2, [Staff #2] to class 4 and [ staff #4] to class 5. After I left for the day, [staff #2], [staff #3] and [staff #1] changed classrooms without permission.? 3. On the afternoon of 6/14/2023, The two-year old class and the three and four-year-old combined class were on the playground together with 2 staff, beginning at approximately 3:50 or 4:00 pm. 4. During a period of approximately 1 hour and 10 minutes to 1 hour and 30 minutes, while this combined group of children was outdoors, four different staff (Staff #1, #2, #3, & #5) were supervising the children in varied combinations, at various times. 5. Children were repeatedly cared for by different staff and placed in the care of staff in different rooms throughout the afternoon on 6/14/2023 and not cared by consistent staff or team of staff members as the center policy stipulates.”

8VAC20-780-340-A

“Based on interviews and a review of documentation, staff did not always ensure the care, protection, and guidance of the children they were supervising. Evidence: 1. On 6/14/2023 at between approximately 3:40 to 3:50 p.m., staff #1 and staff #2 took a group of children, ages 2 to 4 years old, out to the large playground and brought the group of children back inside of the facility at approximately 4:05 or 4:10 p.m. 2. Between approximately 4:58 and 5:07, 2 two-year-old children (child #1 and child #2) were discovered unsupervised on the playground. According to statements given by staff #1, staff #2, staff #3 and parent #1 and parent #2, child #1 and child #2 were outside for an approximate total of between 1 hour, 8 minutes and 1 hour 27 minutes and the portion of that time that they were outside unsupervised was approximately 40 to 60 minutes.\ 3. Parent #2 stated that child #1 and child #2 ran to her when she entered the large playground and that both children appeared to have been crying. Parent #2 described the children as ?dirty, with sand all over them?, and stated that their faces were? red and flushed?. 4. Parent #1 stated that when the children entered the facility with parent #2 they were ?really hot to the touch? and ?red faced?. Parent #1 stated that child #1?s diaper was ?full of poop?. 5. The Emergency Medical Treatment responders, who arrived following a report that the children were missing, advised parent #1 and parent #2 to give the children fluids as soon as possible. Parent #2 stated that her child was ?super thirsty? and ?drank a lot?. 6. According to Weather Underground, the outdoor temperature ranged from 81 to 82 degrees on the afternoon of 6/14/2023 during the time that child #1 and child #2 were on the playground.”

8VAC20-780-340-F

“Based on interviews and a review of documentation, children under 10 years of age were not always within actual sight and sound supervision of staff. Evidence: 1. On 6/14/2023, between approximately 4:05 to 4:10 p.m. a group of children, ages 2 to 4 years, old and 2 staff left the large playground and entered the facility. 2. Parent #1 and Parent #2 arrived at the center and logged their children out on the computer at 4:43 p.m. (child #2) and at 4:47 pm. (child #1). 3. Parent #1 and parent #2 walked to the front classroom to retrieve their children and were told by staff #2 that child #1 and child #2 were in the back classroom. When parent #1 and parent #2 walked to the back classroom they were told by staff # 1 that child # 1 and child #2 were not there. 4. After searching the facility and calling their children’s names for approximately 15 to 20 minutes parent #2 went outside to the large playground and discovered child #1 and child #2 alone and unsupervised in the larger of the two fenced play areas. 5. The 2 two-year-old children had been alone and unsupervised on the playground for approximately 40 to 60 minutes.”

8VAC20-780-500-B Complaint related: No

“Based on documentation and interviews, staff did not always ensure that children are cleaned and changed immediately when their clothes or diaper are wet or soiled. Evidence: The digital program that staff utilize for documenting children's feedings, diaper changes, activities and important information throughout the day showed that:on 5/23/2023, child #1 arrived at the center at 8:50 a.m. Child #1's wet diaper was changed at 9:50 and again at 11:50. Child #1 had a bottle, took a nap and had an afternoon snack between 1:15 p.m. and 3:46 pm and at 4:48 child #1 was signed out and left the center for the day. Nearly 5 hours had passed since child #1's diaper had been changed when she was picked up from care. Child #1's diaper was reportedly very wet at the time that she left the center to go home.”

8VAC20-780-270-A Complaint related: Yes

“Based on interviews, the licensee did not always ensure that areas and equipment, inside and outside, are always maintained in a clean, safe, operable condition. Evidence: Seven staff were interviewed regarding a concern about cleanliness resulting from the toilet not being flushed after each use by children. Two staff stated that they did not always flush the toilet between uses when assisting several young children toileting in succession, as long as the children only urinated. An additional staff acknowledged an awareness that another staff utilizes that practice.”

8VAC20-780-500-B Complaint related: No

“Based on documentation and interviews, staff did not always ensure that children are cleaned and changed immediately when their clothes or diaper are wet or soiled. Evidence: The digital program that staff utilize for documenting children's feedings, diaper changes, activities and important information throughout the day showed that:on 5/23/2023, child #1 arrived at the center at 8:50 a.m. Child #1's wet diaper was changed at 9:50 and again at 11:50. Child #1 had a bottle, took a nap and had an afternoon snack between 1:15 p.m. and 3:46 pm and at 4:48 child #1 was signed out and left the center for the day. Nearly 5 hours had passed since child #1's diaper had been changed when she was picked up from care. Child #1's diaper was reportedly very wet at the time that she left the center to go home.”

8VAC20-780-270-A Complaint related: Yes

“Based on interviews, the licensee did not always ensure that areas and equipment, inside and outside, are always maintained in a clean, safe, operable condition. Evidence: Seven staff were interviewed regarding a concern about cleanliness resulting from the toilet not being flushed after each use by children. Two staff stated that they did not always flush the toilet between uses when assisting several young children toileting in succession, as long as the children only urinated. An additional staff acknowledged an awareness that another staff utilizes that practice.”

8VAC20-780-500-B Complaint related: No

“Based on documentation and interviews, staff did not always ensure that children are cleaned and changed immediately when their clothes or diaper are wet or soiled. Evidence: The digital program that staff utilize for documenting children's feedings, diaper changes, activities and important information throughout the day showed that:on 5/23/2023, child #1 arrived at the center at 8:50 a.m. Child #1's wet diaper was changed at 9:50 and again at 11:50. Child #1 had a bottle, took a nap and had an afternoon snack between 1:15 p.m. and 3:46 pm and at 4:48 child #1 was signed out and left the center for the day. Nearly 5 hours had passed since child #1's diaper had been changed when she was picked up from care. Child #1's diaper was reportedly very wet at the time that she left the center to go home.”

8VAC20-780-270-A Complaint related: Yes

“Based on interviews, the licensee did not always ensure that areas and equipment, inside and outside, are always maintained in a clean, safe, operable condition. Evidence: Seven staff were interviewed regarding a concern about cleanliness resulting from the toilet not being flushed after each use by children. Two staff stated that they did not always flush the toilet between uses when assisting several young children toileting in succession, as long as the children only urinated. An additional staff acknowledged an awareness that another staff utilizes that practice.”

8VAC20-780-500-B Complaint related: No

“Based on documentation and interviews, staff did not always ensure that children are cleaned and changed immediately when their clothes or diaper are wet or soiled. Evidence: The digital program that staff utilize for documenting children's feedings, diaper changes, activities and important information throughout the day showed that:on 5/23/2023, child #1 arrived at the center at 8:50 a.m. Child #1's wet diaper was changed at 9:50 and again at 11:50. Child #1 had a bottle, took a nap and had an afternoon snack between 1:15 p.m. and 3:46 pm and at 4:48 child #1 was signed out and left the center for the day. Nearly 5 hours had passed since child #1's diaper had been changed when she was picked up from care. Child #1's diaper was reportedly very wet at the time that she left the center to go home.”

8VAC20-780-270-A Complaint related: Yes

“Based on interviews, the licensee did not always ensure that areas and equipment, inside and outside, are always maintained in a clean, safe, operable condition. Evidence: Seven staff were interviewed regarding a concern about cleanliness resulting from the toilet not being flushed after each use by children. Two staff stated that they did not always flush the toilet between uses when assisting several young children toileting in succession, as long as the children only urinated. An additional staff acknowledged an awareness that another staff utilizes that practice.”

22.1-289.035-B-4

“Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not always obtain a copy of results of a criminal history record information check, a sex offender registry check, and a search of the child abuse and neglect registry or equivalent registry from any state in which each individual staff has resided in the preceding five years. Evidence: Five staff records were reviewed. The record for staff #1, whose date of employment was documented as 1/202023, contained documentation of her residency in the state of Florida within the past 5 years. The record for staff #1 did not contain results of a Search of the Abuse and Neglect registry for Florida and did not contain results of a Sex Offender Registry for the state of Florida. The program director confirmed that this documentation was not present in staff #1's record. The record for staff #3, whose date of employment was documented as 2/7/2023, contained documentation of her residency in the state of Alabama within the past 5 years. The record for staff #3 did not contain results of a Search of the Abuse and Neglect registry for Alabama, did not contain results of a Sex Offender Registry for the state of Alabama and did not contain a Criminal History Record check for the state of Alabama. The program director confirmed that this documentation was not present in staff #3's record.”

22.1-289.035-B-4

“Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not always obtain a copy of results of a criminal history record information check, a sex offender registry check, and a search of the child abuse and neglect registry or equivalent registry from any state in which each individual staff has resided in the preceding five years. Evidence: Five staff records were reviewed. The record for staff #1, whose date of employment was documented as 1/202023, contained documentation of her residency in the state of Florida within the past 5 years. The record for staff #1 did not contain results of a Search of the Abuse and Neglect registry for Florida and did not contain results of a Sex Offender Registry for the state of Florida. The program director confirmed that this documentation was not present in staff #1's record. The record for staff #3, whose date of employment was documented as 2/7/2023, contained documentation of her residency in the state of Alabama within the past 5 years. The record for staff #3 did not contain results of a Search of the Abuse and Neglect registry for Alabama, did not contain results of a Sex Offender Registry for the state of Alabama and did not contain a Criminal History Record check for the state of Alabama. The program director confirmed that this documentation was not present in staff #3's record.”

8VAC20-780-40-E Complaint related: Yes

“Based on a review of documentation to include the facility's parent handbook, the licensee did not ensure that the center's activities, services, and facilities are always maintained in compliance with the state standards, the center's own policies and procedures that are required by these standards, and the terms of the current license issued by the department. Evidence: 1. The owner / director disenrolled two sibling children, due to staffing shortages, with less than 24 hours notice given to the children's parent. 2. The parent handbook states that children may be disenrolled "due to excessive late payments, inability to adjust, behavioral issues or parental inconsistencies". 3. In addition, the parent handbook states that the center "will give you 2 weeks? notice whenever possible" but that "immediate termination may be required if behavior presents a danger to staff or children". 4. The children were not disenrolled for late payments, inability to adjust, behavioral issues or parental inconsistencies. 5. The license did not adhere to the center's own written policies when disenrolling the 2 children.”

8VAC20-780-90-A

“Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not ensure that each child's record contains a signed agreement between the parent and the center which includes the required agreements. Evidence: Three children's records were reviewed The record for child #1 did not contain a parent signature on the written agreement between the parent and the center. The program director confirmed that this agreement was not signed.”

8VAC20-780-320-B

“Based on temperatures taken with a digital thermometer during the inspection, the licensee did not ensure that each restroom provided for children have sinks located near toilets that are supplied with running warm water that does not exceed 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Evidence: The hot water at the sink in the two year old classroom measured 123.6 degrees Fahrenheit. The hot water at the sink on the back hallway and used by children in care measured 124.2 degrees Fahrenheit. The hot water at the sink next to the kitchen and used by children in care measured 122.9 degrees Fahrenheit.”

8VAC20-780-90-A

“Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee did not ensure that each child's record contains a signed agreement between the parent and the center which includes the required agreements. Evidence: Three children's records were reviewed The record for child #1 did not contain a parent signature on the written agreement between the parent and the center. The program director confirmed that this agreement was not signed.”

8VAC20-780-320-B

“Based on temperatures taken with a digital thermometer during the inspection, the licensee did not ensure that each restroom provided for children have sinks located near toilets that are supplied with running warm water that does not exceed 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Evidence: The hot water at the sink in the two year old classroom measured 123.6 degrees Fahrenheit. The hot water at the sink on the back hallway and used by children in care measured 124.2 degrees Fahrenheit. The hot water at the sink next to the kitchen and used by children in care measured 122.9 degrees Fahrenheit.”

22.1-289.035-B-4

“Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee was unable to demonstrate that she obtained a copy of the results of a criminal history record information check, a sex offender registry check from any state which the individual has resided in the preceding five years. Evidence: Four staff records were reviewed. The record for staff #3 who was hired 4/7/2022, contained a signed Sworn Statement of Affirmation that documented that Staff #3 resided in Hawaii in the past 5 years. The record for Staff #3 did not contain the results of a Hawaii Sex Offender Check. The record for staff #4, who was hired 4/5/2022, contained a signed Sworn Statement of Affirmation that documented that staff #4 resided in New Mexico within the past 5 years. The record for staff #4 did not contain the results of a New Mexico Sex Offender Check. The record for staff #4 did not contain the results of a New Mexico Criminal Record Check. The program director was unable to furnish the requested documentation of the above background checks requested during the inspection.”

8VAC20-780-270-A

“Based on observation, the licensee did not ensure that all areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside, are maintained in a clean, safe, operable condition. Evidence: The licensing inspector observed two nails protruding with the sharp end of the nails pointed on to the interior side of the gate on the playground used by children for outdoor play. Two additional nails were observed to be protruding from an adjacent fence panel with the sharp end of the nails pointed to the interior side of the fence panel on the playground used by children for outdoor play. The program director was shown the protruding nails and acknowledged that they needed to be removed.”

8VAC20-780-320-B

“Based on temperature readings with a digital thermometer, the licensee did not ensure that restrooms for children have sinks located near the toilets that are supplied with running warm water that does not exceed 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Evidence: The water from the hot water faucets located in the preschool bathroom sink and the infant handwashing sink measured 131.5 degrees Fahrenheit with a digital thermometer during the inspection.”

22.1-289.035-B-4

“Based on a review of records and interview, the licensee was unable to demonstrate that she obtained a copy of the results of a criminal history record information check, a sex offender registry check from any state which the individual has resided in the preceding five years. Evidence: Four staff records were reviewed. The record for staff #3 who was hired 4/7/2022, contained a signed Sworn Statement of Affirmation that documented that Staff #3 resided in Hawaii in the past 5 years. The record for Staff #3 did not contain the results of a Hawaii Sex Offender Check. The record for staff #4, who was hired 4/5/2022, contained a signed Sworn Statement of Affirmation that documented that staff #4 resided in New Mexico within the past 5 years. The record for staff #4 did not contain the results of a New Mexico Sex Offender Check. The record for staff #4 did not contain the results of a New Mexico Criminal Record Check. The program director was unable to furnish the requested documentation of the above background checks requested during the inspection.”

8VAC20-780-270-A

“Based on observation, the licensee did not ensure that all areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside, are maintained in a clean, safe, operable condition. Evidence: The licensing inspector observed two nails protruding with the sharp end of the nails pointed on to the interior side of the gate on the playground used by children for outdoor play. Two additional nails were observed to be protruding from an adjacent fence panel with the sharp end of the nails pointed to the interior side of the fence panel on the playground used by children for outdoor play. The program director was shown the protruding nails and acknowledged that they needed to be removed.”

8VAC20-780-320-B

“Based on temperature readings with a digital thermometer, the licensee did not ensure that restrooms for children have sinks located near the toilets that are supplied with running warm water that does not exceed 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Evidence: The water from the hot water faucets located in the preschool bathroom sink and the infant handwashing sink measured 131.5 degrees Fahrenheit with a digital thermometer during the inspection.”

8VAC20-820-120-E-2

“Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not visibly post the most recent findings (violation notice) of the most recent licensing inspection of the program. Evidence: The last inspection Summary was posted on a parent information board located just inside the entrance used by parents to enter the center. The violation notice was behind the summary page and was not visible. There was a clear plexiglass cover over the board enclosing the posted items. The administrator removed the document from the board and showed the inspector that the violation notice was behind the Summary page stating that it was inadvertently posted backwards.”

8VAC20-820-120-E-5

“Based on observation and interview, the provided notice of the commissioner's intent to take actions enumerated in ? 63.2-1709.2 of the Code of Virginia was not posted in a prominent place at each public entrance of the facility to advise consumers of serious or persistent violations. Evidence: The inspector did not observe the Notice of Intent posted in the facility during the inspection on 2/11/2022. The administrator confirmed that the Notice of Intent was not posted and stated that she was not aware that she was required to post it.”

8VAC20-820-120-E-7

“Based on observation and interview, the the approved written notification to parents required by the commissioner was not posted in a prominent place at each public entrance of the licensed premises pursuant to ?? 22.1-289.011 and 22.1-289.023 of the Code of Virginia. Evidence: The inspector did not observe the approved written notification to parents posted in the facility during the inspection on 2/11/2022. The administrator confirmed that the Parent Correspondence was not posted and stated that she was not aware that she was required to post it.”

8VAC20-820-120-E-6

“Based on observation and interview, the Special Order issued by the department was not posted in a prominent place at each public entrance of the licensed premises to advise consumers of serious or persistent violations. Evidence: The inspector did not observe the Special Order posted in the facility during the inspection on 2/11/2022. The administrator confirmed that the Special Order was not posted and stated that she was not aware that she was required to post it.”