KCE Champions LLC @ Tanners Creek Elementary

8VAC20-780-350-C

“Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the center failed to ensure that when children are in ongoing mixed age groups, the staff-to-children ratio and group size applicable to the youngest child in the group shall apply to the entire group. Evidence: 1. The youngest child at the center was 5 years old which the staff-to-children ratio is 1 staff member to 18 children. Present at the center were 19 children and 1 staff member. 2. Staff #1 confirmed that the center was out of ratio. The youngest child present was 5 years old and Staff #1 confirmed 19 children were present in care. There was no assistant teacher or additional staff at the center. 3. In reviewing the face to name attendance sheet, there were 19 children listed and one staff member starting at 3:10pm.”

8VAC20-780-340-F

“Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the center failed to ensure children under 10 years of age always shall be within actual sight and sound supervision of staff. Evidence: 1. Two children under the age of 10 years old were observed going to the water fountain and restroom without adult staff supervision located outside of the room. 2. Staff #1 was observed prompting other children in care to check on the children at the water fountain and restroom located outside of the room.”

8VAC20-780-340-C

“Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the center failed to ensure that during the stated hours of operation, there always shall be on the premises when one or more children are present one staff member who meets the qualifications of a program leader or program director and an immediately available staff member with direct means for communication between the two of them. Evidence: 1. In speaking with all 14 children as a group, they confirmed that there was only one staff member present at the after school program CDC. 2. Staff #1 confirmed that they were the only staff member present at the center supervising all 19 children in care. 3. Staff #3, program manager, confirmed that they were aware that there was only one staff member at the center to supervise children under the age of 12 years old.”

8VAC20-780-350-C

“Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the center failed to ensure that when children are in ongoing mixed age groups, the staff-to-children ratio and group size applicable to the youngest child in the group shall apply to the entire group. Evidence: 1. The youngest child at the center was 5 years old which the staff-to-children ratio is 1 staff member to 18 children. Present at the center were 19 children and 1 staff member. 2. Staff #1 confirmed that the center was out of ratio. The youngest child present was 5 years old and Staff #1 confirmed 19 children were present in care. There was no assistant teacher or additional staff at the center. 3. In reviewing the face to name attendance sheet, there were 19 children listed and one staff member starting at 3:10pm.”

8VAC20-780-340-F

“Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the center failed to ensure children under 10 years of age always shall be within actual sight and sound supervision of staff. Evidence: 1. Two children under the age of 10 years old were observed going to the water fountain and restroom without adult staff supervision located outside of the room. 2. Staff #1 was observed prompting other children in care to check on the children at the water fountain and restroom located outside of the room.”

8VAC20-780-340-C

“Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the center failed to ensure that during the stated hours of operation, there always shall be on the premises when one or more children are present one staff member who meets the qualifications of a program leader or program director and an immediately available staff member with direct means for communication between the two of them. Evidence: 1. In speaking with all 14 children as a group, they confirmed that there was only one staff member present at the after school program CDC. 2. Staff #1 confirmed that they were the only staff member present at the center supervising all 19 children in care. 3. Staff #3, program manager, confirmed that they were aware that there was only one staff member at the center to supervise children under the age of 12 years old.”

8VAC20-780-160-A

“Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the center did not ensure that each staff member shall submit documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening. The documentation of the screening shall be submitted at the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with children. Evidence: 1. Staff #2 (date of hire 9/27/23) that was present in the center working with children did not have a negative tuberculosis screening completed prior to the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with children. 2. Staff #3, manager, confirmed that Staff #2 does not have a tuberculosis screening completed.”

22.1-289.011-F

“Based on observation and interview it was determined that the center did not ensure that the finding of the most recent inspection of the facility was posted on the premises of the facility. Evidence: 1. The most recent inspection from August 15, 2023, was not posted on the premises. 2. Staff #1 confirmed that the most recent inspection was not printed and not posted on the premises of the facility.”

8VAC20-780-160-A

“Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the center did not ensure that each staff member shall submit documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening. The documentation of the screening shall be submitted at the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with children. Evidence: 1. Staff #2 (date of hire 9/27/23) that was present in the center working with children did not have a negative tuberculosis screening completed prior to the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with children. 2. Staff #3, manager, confirmed that Staff #2 does not have a tuberculosis screening completed.”

22.1-289.011-F

“Based on observation and interview it was determined that the center did not ensure that the finding of the most recent inspection of the facility was posted on the premises of the facility. Evidence: 1. The most recent inspection from August 15, 2023, was not posted on the premises. 2. Staff #1 confirmed that the most recent inspection was not printed and not posted on the premises of the facility.”